Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Yawning Angel

Members
  • Posts

    856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Yawning Angel

  1. 12 hours ago, Kon said:

    Insane amount of details. Nice processing as always.

    Thanks! My Quark has some nonuniformity but with careful flat generation it cleans up

    12 hours ago, Hals said:

    Absolutely top drawer work Alex 👍

    Thank you! Your comment cheered me up on this rainy morning!

    • Haha 1
  2. 20 minutes ago, TakMan said:

    Very good Alex - despite what you say about your seeing, the detail throughout has held up really strongly - the spicules  especially….  and that’s from a capture over midday - not nice and early or late on when seeing (for me anyway) is usually better…
    Personally I slowed your movie down to half speed on the iPhone and found it even better to view!

    How long was each capture and % used in general)?

    I don’t think a lot of folks (who don’t do solar) appreciate the effort that does into a solar animation of this quality.

    As for my own solar imaging…. ‘We’ cleaned the garage out yesterday as I’d already agreed to… 7 hrs including trips to the local tip - great timing hey!

    Damian

    Thanks!

    The captures were 15 seconds limited then wait 45 second using SharpCap. It got around 2300 (5ms and 158 fps) in that time. 10% stacked as a batch in AS!4. I think the default output from Photoshop has it at 30fps, but I might try a slower version at your suggestion

    A tidy garage gives you more room for telescopes! 🙂

    • Haha 1
  3. 55 minutes ago, Kon said:

    Excellent animation and the prominence looks really nice and delicate.

    Thank you! I was quite surprised it came out reasonable as the seeing was far from steady

    53 minutes ago, callisto said:

    Mesmerising 😵‍💫 

    Thanks for sharing 👍

    Thanks! Happy you liked it

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Ags said:

    I think that’s a great improvement!

    What was the imaging scope / camera combination?

    Thank you!

    APM107 / 700mm + Flattener & ASI1600mm. Baader filters

    • Like 1
  5. I captures 5hr 20min of HaLRGB on M51 last year. For want of some data, I've had another crack at it:

    2024, cropped
    HaLRGBcrop.thumb.jpg.db0868986d90ab3d1ee3b235a514fab1.jpg

    2024, full FOV
    HaLRGB.thumb.jpg.da9392afbe1a88467d32e165061720d7.jpg

    2023 process, crop
    Image04.jpg.e2e85c4af6ffcc3fb7c7447c636b3c85.jpg

    • Like 7
  6. 14 minutes ago, John_D said:

    😁 What taking the individual images did you reposition the telescope manually each time?

    Yes, a manual slew each time. I eyeball a surface feature near the edge I'm moving towards, then slew till it's in the equivalent position on the other side. This gives me plenty of overlap for ICE to align the segments. You can see the overlap in these folder thumbnails

    tiles.thumb.png.c41ac50f4546f3a354a9a4077d2c3ffb.png

    • Thanks 1
  7. 7 hours ago, WestCoastCannuck said:

    Well....  now THAT is just wonderfully insane.   I absolutely love it and I salute you for your attempting it...  and best yet,  succeeding!   A wonderful image.   You can see some panels here and there that suffered a little from variable seeing...  but not many!   Your seeing mostly held for the whole thing!  Fabulous!   I hope to do something similar one day with my own C11.  :))))))

     

    Mike

    Thank you! I was amazed that my seeing held up as well as it did for the mosaic. I looks forward to seeing your rendition, Mike!

  8. On a whim, I mounted the C11 last night intending to do a bit of a shakedown of the setup after adding a new focus motor and powerbox.

    I got carried away.

    47 panels, 500 frames each. C11, ProPlanet 642 filter with the asi178mm

    Stacked in AS!4.0.11, Mosaic in MS ICE, processed PixInsight and PS

    Click (34mb just under 12000 x 12000)

    47panelmosaic-138.5megapixels.thumb.jpg.0d327f293e34ee65443f998770be6db4.jpg

    • Like 18
  9. On 15/04/2024 at 11:57, Adreneline said:

    Interesting to see what you've achieved - I am currently imaging the exact same thing and have amassed 150m of R, G and B and 90m of Lum - it's a challenge.

    I think I prefer your Medium Iris but your Bold dust/background.

    Adrian

    Thank you! I'll be redoing it from scratch when I add some more integration time, and I agree that there is a balance somewhere between those two.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.