Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

rwilkey

Members
  • Posts

    4,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rwilkey

  1. Hi Mark, welcome to SGL!  No need to worry about collimation yet, new scopes usually arrive well collimated (ie. the mirrors aligned).  Smaller scopes like yours keep their collimation better than larger scopes.  If you are likely to travel a lot with your scope then you will need to think about collimation soon, but don't worry!

    • Like 1
  2. Hi Paul, first of all, welcome to SGL!  Yes, the link you give is identical to the specifications of the Heritage.  The customer reviews are also encouraging.  In my opinion this would be a great starter telescope, good aperture and rich field (f/5) which means it would show good portions of the Moon and star clusters etc, a good 'wide' choice.

    • Like 1
  3. 3 hours ago, Traceyh said:

    I had seen a one in Jessops. It's the Celeston PS1000.  Is this any good as an entry level. Some of comments I've had is like double Dutch to me ...very confusing sorry

    Hi Tracey, never consider a telescope from a high street store, they know little of mechanics, the scope you highlight is of particularly poor design.  Always consider buying a telescope from a specialist supplier, like the forum's sponsors FLO, they are no more expensive than cheap suppliers like those on the high street.  With a proper supplier you also get good service and fast delivery, and expert advice if you need it.  Good luck with your choices!

  4. Hi Maniek, for choice I would choose the 21E over the 17E, the 21E is a good all-rounder, I have the 17 Nagler and to be honest it is not used.  The E13 is a good choice for starters, excellent on the Moon!

    • Like 1
  5. Hello again Maniek, best not to go too high on magnification, this is the mistake many make.  Most stargazing is done at low magnifications, esp. DSO's.  An excellent choice of eyepieces, but as John says, there are good cheaper alternatives, including Explore Scientific.

  6. 2 hours ago, Neil H said:

    it's looks strange as the weight is level or above the telescope a little and telescope ends up lower than when I started, but if that sounds right to you guys then I go with that

    Hi Neil, yes, that is pretty much it, as the mount is pointing north you have to do what is commonly called a 'meridian flip' to look south, and if it is a reflector the eyepiece and focuser are now upside down and you then have to rotate the OTA to a comfortable position - one of the reasons I prefer AZ mounts.

  7. Hi there, yes, you have a difficult choice but it all depends on your budget, the BST's are clearly good runners because of the price and AFOV, however, I have tried the Vixen's and they are stunning and really sharp, if I had to make the choice I would choose the Vixen SLV's, however, at twice the price I am afraid.  To be honest, you wouldn't really notice the difference in the AFoV's, quality is the key here.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.