rwilkey

Hey Steve, that's one of the reasons I changed my Newtonian to an AZ mount, wait 'til you have to do a meridian flip (flip right over haha).  To me it's AZ everytime esp. as I am now partially disabled since I bought my Newt. 

Hi to both of you from sunny (?) Swindon.  Clear skies!

Hi Lorenzo, welcome from me, you could not have cramped more in your life than you have already done, astronomy will be gaining much from your experiences I think.

Hi Gary, a very warm welcome from me too.  Clear skies!

Hi DandD, like Joe above I think a 32mm eyepiece will be most useful, many people never take this one out of the telescope because it gives such a good view of the night sky.  The Celestron Omni Plossl is a good one, found here:

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/celestron-eyepieces/celestron-omni-plossl-eyepiece.html

Good luck with your stargazing!

Salut et bienvenue chez SGL

Hi there, and a very warm welcome from me in Swindon, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyy down south!

I think the biggest problem you will find is the EQ-2 mount and tripod, which could be a little unsteady, the other problem you will find is that they are difficult to collimate as there is a Barlow lens in the focuser, preventing a collimation tool from being properly inserted.  My advice is to make the most of this new toy and get some viewing experience in so that you will know where to go next.  Clear skies!

Hi Rich, a very warm welcome from me too, here in Swindon.  Clear skies!

23 hours ago, grjsk said:

I really enjoy the slow motion controls, so I don't think the AZ-4 is an option. The AZ-5 has the same weight limit as the AZ-3, but is it regarded as a more sturdy mount overall? That could be an option..

Hi there, I agree with others, the AZ3 option is risky/borderline, the AZ5 would be a good contender.  I chose the Vixen Porta II Mount which carries my f/9 100ED well and has slo-mo controls.  The only thing is that it is more expensive, but what price stability?

Hi Gottzi, a very warm welcome back, I am sure the rain will stop soon.  Clear skies!

On 12/10/2019 at 01:34, John said:

In my opinion a 100mm ED doublet would have the edge over an ST120 for white light solar observing with a wedge. I use my Lunt wedge with my Vixen 102mm ED and Tak FC 100 and the results are really good.

On double stars I think it would be a close run thing but personally I feel that good ED doublet refractors have provided the most satisfying views of double stars of any scope types that I have used. 

On lunar observing, again it would be a close run thing between a good ED 100mm doublet and a 127mm mak-cassegrain.

Hi Paz,

I agree entirely with John's suggestion, I find my ED100 is a good 'all-rounder', if there is ever such a thing, great for planets and doubles and also solar.  The only thing I found was that I had to up my game in eyepieces to get the most out of the opportunities that a semi apo offers, and to be honest, I have never looked back.  Whether it would beat your combo I have no idea as I have not used the scopes you refer to, but it would give them a bl**** good run for the money.

Hi Mike and a warm welcome from me too!

Hi Portech, the EQ5 tripod is absolutely solid and will also serve you for any future upgrade, it will make your viewing more pleasurable.  My mount has a SkyTee II mount on it, but it shows how strong and solid it is for now and future options:

Hi Len, a warm welcome from me too!

Our speaker for October will be Rob Slack:  'The Grand Tour - Mission to the Giants' about the Pioneer and Voyager missions to the outer planets.

Rob has been a member of Swindon Stargazers from its conception and is a keen practical astronomer and astrophotographer, he also plays a significant role in outreach on behalf of the club.  There will also be a short talk: 'Beginners Guide To Telescope Eyepieces' as part of our regular Sky Brief. 

More information here: http://www.swindonstargazers.com/clubdiary/clubdiary.htm

Hi Glob, a warm welcome from me too, from a very wet and rainy Swindon!

As John does, I also keep mine in flight cases, but for individual protection I use plastic bolt cases like these, they come in a number of different sizes:

On 26/09/2019 at 12:57, Dan_wirral said:

Do you think it would work better with smaller refractor?

Hi Dan, yes, the Hyperion will work well in long tube refractors (f8 and slower, or there abouts), but not in the 'shorty' refractors as they are usually fast scopes (around f/5 etc)

On 25/09/2019 at 16:09, alan potts said:

More expensive Piero but would a De-lite not fit the bill or even an older Radian if you can find one, i use to like Radians, still a 4mm, never believed all this colour caste talk.

Hi Alan, I bought a couple of Radians s/h about a year ago and would agree with your observations.

Hi Dan, the Celestron Omnis are OK but the Baader Hyperion does not perform well at f/5 (outer edges soft etc), I would suggest replacing this one.  I would recommend an Explore Scientific 62° Series 9mm, or the 82° Series 11mm if you can stretch to that price.  From expereience the 82° Series gives stunning performance and the 11mm is no exception.  Links here:

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/explore-scientific-eyepieces/explore-scientific-62-series-ler-eyepieces.html

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/explore-scientific-eyepieces/explore-scientific-82-degree-series-eyepieces.html

Hi there, the best thing you can do is get some good observing in, try out those new eyepieces starting with the lowest power (the highest number! 32mm).  Clear skies

Hi Wormix, the 18mm BST is a good one to go for, excellent AFoV. 

Hi Cary, welcome to SGL, I am a former artist (landscapes) who had to give up after I had a stroke, but took up astronomy soon after, never looked back (just up instead haha!)

Hi Mark, a warm welcome from me too, as others have said, that is a great mount you have there.  Clear skies!