Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

rwilkey

Members
  • Posts

    4,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rwilkey

  1. 11 hours ago, BlueStinger said:

    Which forum would be best to post any images taken with my phone through the binoculars that I deem worthy of showing?

    Hi Blue, 'Getting Started With Imaging' would be a good place to start, I think.

    • Thanks 1
  2. Hi Stephanos, I am not a photographer but an observer only and from an observing point of view and ease of use the Skyliner 200P is streets ahead of the 130P, I understand the EQ2 mount is not very stable from other comments on this forum.  However, if you are only interested in astrophotography, which I sense you are, then your first purchase should be this book by Steve Richards 'Making Every Photon Count', it will show you that small refractors are more suitable for astrophotography anf other great tips.  Welcome to the forum BTW!

    • Like 1
  3. Hi Blue, my family came from Somerset (Taunton, parish of St James) in the early 1600's (during the late reign of Queen Elizabeth I) so I feel I have some affiliation with Somerset, esp. as I was born & bred in Bath.  Now in Swindon I am not all that far from you.  A warm welcome to the forum and enjoy your new toy.  Clear skies!

    • Thanks 1
  4. 6 hours ago, Plissken said:

    But I could just about stretch to the skywatcher 72ed if need be, but then I will have to buy a 2inch diagonal and 2 inch eye pieces? I'm I right?

    Hi Plissken, welcome to the forum.  No, you do not have to buy 2" eyepieces, the 2" diagonals always come with a 2" to 1.25" adaptor, so you can use 1.25" ep's without a problem.  I use a 2" diagonal but find I use 1.25" ep's most of the time, the disadvantage of 2" ep's are that they are heavy (you may have balancing problems with the 72ED) and they are more expensive.  They do have advantages, of course, not least their wide rich fields. 

  5. On 29/02/2020 at 22:09, gjh613 said:

    the more I learn the more I appreciate how much more there is to learn.

    Hi Geoff, I think we all find that.  A very warm welcome from me.  Clear skies!

  6. 44 minutes ago, Raph-in-the-sky said:

    I hear a lot about this book. Do you think it's suitable for someone who has no experience in photography whatsoever ? (basically I know which button you re supposed to push to take a pic... that's it)

    Hi Raph, yes, I suppose you might call it 'borderline', however, the book concentrates on what astro-gear you need more than the actual nuances of the photography itself, it's about telescopes, mounts and guiding, with a good section devoted to computer programs used in processing the finished image.  I have no experience in photography whatsoever and I comprehended every paragraph, it's a good 'read' to be honest. 

    • Like 1
  7. Hi Mike, welcome also from me.  We are lucky here in Swindon because though with have talks at our club, we also have a small group of observers, sometimes it is just two or three of us and we text or email when we are going out.  I appreciate your frustration but I find a number of our club members are 'armchair' astronomers, so we have a small, but lively group of members.  Good luck and clear skies!

  8. 1 hour ago, RobH2020 said:

    So my lesson here seems to be there are no 1.25" barrel eyepieces in the 60-ish-degrees range over about 25mm. I need to ramp up to a 2" barrel, and probably pay a little more. Does that sound like I've understood?

    Hi Rob, that just about sums it up, what scope do you have and does it have a 2" focuser?  Yes, they get more expensive and a 2" would get you more of the sky.  If your telescope focal ratio is slower than f/6 then the 32mm Panaview 70° would be a good choice as John suggested above.  On-axis this is a stunning ep and was my first upgrade, never looked back!

    • Like 1
  9. Hi Rob, and welcome to the Lounge.  Alan is a great guy to deal with, when I first started buying from him he used to send me a little pack of sweets with my order.  I have also met him a couple of times in London.  On your question, I am not sure why the StarGuiders are not made in longer focal lengths except to say they would need better glass and be better corrected.  As an alternative I would recommend the Explore Scientific 52° LER Series 30mm, a bit more expensive but you can guarantee well-corrected and comfortable to use (long eye relief).  Found here: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/explore-scientific-eyepieces/explore-scientific-52-ler-series-eyepieces.html

    • Thanks 1
  10. Hi David, I am not a photographer but a web designer so use PS quite a bit, but I have had a little go at your picture, the first is Image>Adjust>Curves, and the second is >Colour Balance as follows on top of the >CurvesHorsehead01.jpg.658dde8acbb1194e2fde1e8bd2d97284.jpgHorsehead02.jpg.24b7d833d5796b7c8576e2c600cde3b2.jpg:

    You would do well to separate the two subjects and treat them individually.  BTW, I was using an older version of PS: 5.5

     

    • Like 2
  11. 2 hours ago, johnturley said:

    you may find that you need an extension tube (probably just 35mm)

    Hi there, I use Baader Fine Tuning Rings (FTRs) for this purpose as I found the standard extensions took it too far out.  I always have the 14mm and the 28mm close at hand, fits snugly in the diagonal.  But as others have said, the telescope was built for observing objects much further away (2 billion miles?), so try it out on Orion or the Moon.  The 14mm ExSc 82º is a classic and very useful ep to have in your armoury, so stick with it.  Clear skies!

    • Like 2
  12. I agree with Louis D above, the Baader Morpheus would be more suitable for both of you, eye-relief is around 20mm which would suit both of you.  They are quite expensive but do meet your criteria, better to spend a bit more now as they will serve you well in the future.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.