Jump to content

rwilkey

Members
  • Posts

    4,303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rwilkey

  1. On 01/06/2020 at 20:05, badgerchap said:

    I somewhat suspected that, and I guess the subsequent jump to the Luminos would be even less significant

    It is the 'law of diminishing returns' I think, the wide-field of the Luminous will not benefit you very much because of the long F/L of your scope, I believe, plus they are heavy for what they are and not the easiest ep's to use, they are clumsy.

    • Like 2
  2. 9 hours ago, Dannomiss said:

    Is this the telrad? 

    Screenshot_20200531_003931_com.android.chrome.jpg

    Hi Dan, a warm welcome from me here in the south west.  Just a quick comment, I don't think the Telrad will be suitable for your telescope, it will be too big, the suggestion of the Rigel Quickfinder is a better one.  Clear skies!

  3. 10 hours ago, bomberbaz said:

    When I posted this I was having some whimsical ideas regarding my eyepiece collection. I have for a while been thinking about adding a 24mm panoptic despite owning a 26mm nagler.

    Hi Steve, the great advantage in my opinion is that the 24 Pan is a 1.25", whereas the 26 Nag is not, that makes the 24 Pan very easy to use as 2" eps can be unwieldly and heavy, esp. for a smaller, lighter set-up, in other words, so I think it is more versatile.  Like John has intimated in the past, it also quickly became my favourite ep.

    • Like 2
  4. Hi Mikey, a warm welcome to the forum.  Two things to add to what others have said.

    1) Make sure you buy your scope from a dedicated astronomy supplier such as the forum sponsors, FLO, delivery is quick and efficient and the support incomparable.  Click on their header above.

    2) If you have astrophotography in your sights further down the line, then this will seriously affect your purchase now.  If you need further advice on this invest in a copy of a book called 'Making Every Photon Count' by Steve Richards, it will save you loads of money and heartache, found here: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/books/making-every-photon-count-steve-richards.html

    Good luck and clear skies!

  5. 1 hour ago, miguel87 said:

    Thanks for the tip. I'm not sure about attaching to the end of the adaptor tho?

    My 1.25 to 2 inch adaptor is just flanged at the end and tightened with two finger screws as if it was an eyepiece.

    Maybe I am missing something?

    Also would there not then be a problem with reaching focus with a 1.25inch eyepiece?

    Sorry Miguel, John above is quite right, it will not work with the SW 200P.  I haven't used mine since I became partially disabled a few years ago.  It works, of course, with refractors that have a 2" - 1.25" adaptor or a diagonal. 

    The use of filters has no impact at all on focus.

    • Like 1
  6. On 04/05/2020 at 17:54, miguel87 said:

    'm saving my cash for the astronomik UHC. Cant decide whether to get 1.25" or 2".

    I only have one 2" eyepiece,

    Hi Miguel, always go for 2" as you can use these with either 2" or 1.25" ep's by attaching the filter to the 2" end of your adapter, you don't need to attach filters to ep's at all and it saves faffing about when you switch ep's.  A filter can be placed in any part of the focal chain.

    • Like 2
  7. 1 minute ago, deufrai said:

    I actually live about 30km away

    That's great, you should have some great skies there.  The furthest out of Paris I have been is Neuilly (but still in the city) a long time ago!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.