-
Posts
6,593 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Alien 13
-
-
-
3 hours ago, stash_old said:
IMHO and experience, not true in that 95% of mounts that can be IP/UDP wired controlled can be controlled via WiFi - e.g. Old SW AZ Goto mounts can easily be controlled via WiFi. E.G using Sky Watcher Wifi Adapter(£70) or build yours own. but there are caveats !
You can then use Planetarium software to point the device/Dslr (although horizon limitation problems come into play)
if you are into Python programming you can supply AZ/Alt or RA/Dec positions(depends on the mount type) via Ascom (assuming your Mount can be controlled by Ascom) mount driver to point your mount
You can even convert a lot of none WiFi Dslr's to Wifi devices using an RPI Zero W , VirtualHere and either Windows ,Linux or OSX PC's/Tablets - but yes the download to he PC is slower but acceptable. Then use something like APT/ByEos to control the DSLR - so about £70 including APT/RPI Zero/VirtualHere
So there are ways and not at a great expense - especially if you already have some older kit - else buy the AZ-GTI which is a nicely priced item ( I dont work for Sky Watcher , FLO etc ) that could be "adapted" for normal photography - but watch he horizon limits.
So not as bad as you "one finger" in IMO
Now if it could follow a laser pointer that would be cool!!!!
Thanks, I was thinking more off the shelf and app controlled, the only one I know about is the Cam Ranger at about £500 although there might be some pro devices about costing four figures.
Alan
-
21 minutes ago, Barry said:
Does this mount also do basic panning between user added positions for terrestrial photography and time lapse, in a similar way to the SW Merlin Multi Function Mount?
I too am interested in its use for normal photography, the number of DSLR mounts that can be WiFi controlled can be counted on one finger...
Alan
-
I am watching and have been for over a day now, not holding my breath though...
Alan
-
1
-
-
Still sitting there, its not as if this is rocket science it should be as mundane as starting a car...
Alan
-
2
-
-
Shame they cant use military rockets, instant launch every time you want one..
Alan
-
Its like watching paint dry to be honest, how hard can it be after nearly 70 years of practice...
Alan
-
1
-
-
It could also be filter tilt or they not being suitable at f/2, easy to check by removing one..
Alan
-
5 minutes ago, geordie85 said:
Is this true? So if the polarfinder app has Polaris at the very bottom, I need to put Polaris at the very top of the circle in the polar scope?
No, the apps like polar finder give you a real view i.e. they correct the orientation.
Alan
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Shelster1973 said:
Slight hijack, but will hopefullyhelp others..... does anyone have any diy solutions to being able to view the polarscope without contortions?
Am finding it a reet pain to do the kneeling/squating thing
Great pic too wsg. I plan on hitting this target when I get the opportunity
Get one of these, just hold against the polarscope...
Its a RA camera viewfinder, you could make a DIY fitting for it if you wanted but I dont bother.
Alan
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, kendg said:
I wonder if there is a USB powered red LED light.
That might do the trick. I'll have to check into it.
There are lots of them
You would need a 1 way to 2 way splitter or a battery bank with two outputs (most of the higher power ones do)
Alan
-
Some power banks will shut down if there is not enough standing current, the ones I have (pound/discount shop) work fine with my EQ3-2 but I expect the intelligent ones might be the problem. There is a fix if you are electronically minded either by adding a small constant load or switching one in every few seconds, this blog provides some details https://www.dorkbotpdx.org/blog/paul/battery_pack_load
Alan
P.S. I have to say that the power to weight ratio of these devices means I use them for most everything now, even powering my Canon DSLR and emergency lights, oh and any projects I have on the go.
-
1
-
-
The wedge needs to be screwed directly to the tripod i.e. remove the pan/tilt head..
Alan
-
The "unusual telescopes" looks good, like the way they keep their hats on
Alan
-
2
-
-
7 minutes ago, HN50 said:
Another slightly underwhelming update approaching, but I am feeling a bit chuffed.
I have been learning how to program an Arduino ('Exploring Arduino' by Jeremy Blum) and have been able to;
1) Detect a varying voltage (used a spare potentiometer)
2) Get time from a real time clock
3) Log results from #1 and #2 to an SD card every minute
4) Use a transistor as a switch to turn on an LED
My thinking is that if I can master all the above I have the basic ingredients for my logging module. Today I have been trying to get #4 modified to turn a radio on and off; the bit in the red box below is the transistor switch (2N3904 transistor). I gather these can take a maximum of 200mA - the radio seems to draw 150mA so I think it might be okay.
Anyway, I got the radio hooked up to spectrum lab and several weeks of work/frowning gave me this;
The radio comes on at ~57.75 seconds, is on for a second, then goes off.
Hahahahaha!
A little underwhelming, but baby-steps and all that.
Next I will try tinkering with the radio output so that it goes into the Arduino and gets logged, though at the moment I am trying to get the new version radio laid out and the narrow band filter working.
Dave
Impressive, you will learn lots from this project..
Alan
-
1
-
-
I use one of these for my scope https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/skywatcher-2-inch-t-adapter.html but if your focusser draw tube is threaded then simple T tubes will work https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/t2-extension-tube-set.html the diagonal takes up about 2 inches of back focus.
Alan
-
Great project, well done..
Alan
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Shelster1973 said:
Aperture mask is a good idea. Am guessing does not cause any vignette issues?
It can do if you go to extremes but normally you step down to something like f/4 which often seems like the "sweet spot", a step down filter ring is often an easy solution, this is an example https://www.ebay.co.uk/i/281824071625?chn=ps&dispItem=1&adgroupid=49523053841&rlsatarget=pla-352776031395&abcId=1128956&adtype=pla&merchantid=113698737&poi=&googleloc=1006867&device=c&campaignid=857339205&crdt=0
You would need to calculate the size required for your lens filter thread and required f/stop.
Alan
-
Star adventurer challenge, any subject and any scope/camera/lens combo that will fit.
Alan
-
I cant understand why anyone is crouching down looking through any polarscope, there have been lots of threads mentioning the use of a camera right angled viewfinder
its such a simple solution.
Alan
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, PeterCPC said:
Thanks Alan. I have read that there can be banding issues with the 750d - do you know about this?
Peter
I dont have this issue with my 80D which has a similar sensor but have no idea about the 750D, I did find this site http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm which would suggest that the 1200D is actually a very good performer with a lower read noise than a 700D
Alan
-
10 minutes ago, PeterCPC said:
Thanks Alan. What would be the benefits of swapping to a 750d?
Peter
The sensor is different and the processor is Digic 6 vs Digic 4 so noise performance should be better, you also have more features and wi fi connectivity which I find very useful if I want to shoot and view from indoors
Alan
-
The 600D is undoubtedly a better package than the 1200D but from the responses is not a worthwhile upgrade, something like the 700 or 750D would be a different thing though.
Alan
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Stub Mandrel said:
... and it's all your fault!
I love mine
Alan
-
1
-
Imaging with a Star Adventurer
in Getting Started With Imaging
Posted
Impressive for such a small mount, I quite fancy a mini..
Alan