Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Alien 13

Members
  • Posts

    6,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alien 13

  1. 1 hour ago, geordie85 said:

    The hermes guy just delivered this to me. It's a nebula red alienware m17x r2. 

    Now I just need to go through and download all the drivers and software needed for astro imaging (which is actually alot more than I though since I downloaded everything as and when I needed it on my old laptop).

    I bought it off ebay for £430 and it sounds like there may be something wrong with the fans. They're making a rather loud clicking/ buzzing noise.

    DSC_2122.JPG

    DSC_2123.JPG

    The full workshop manuals for Alienware laptops are usually freely available off the Dell website should you want to take it apart, might just need a blow out though through the exhaust ports.

    Alan

  2. 20 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

    Will the ED glass be corrective enough at f4.8 to squash any CA if used with a camera?

    I think that there is a reasonable chance it might, CA is a function of f ratio and objective size. I can only find this old chart for normal achros but it gives you an idea.

    CA-ratio-chart-achro.jpg.f83432d3901089690aa1ff6a4bbdb6b4.jpg

    If you extrapolate down to an imaginary 50mm objective it would suggest even normal glass would be ok at around f/6.

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

    yeah the screen flips out and i did zoom but maybe the cold made me rush. i have usually used BYEOS to focus but may try more with live view just to see how it goes. wish my focus rings were a little stiffer and not so slack

    The slack focus rings are a bit of a problem with the kit type lenses but I think there are a few tricks to stiffen them up like a tiny bit of blutack, worth having an internet search. As said the polar alignment on you image looks good and focus is not far off with all the tiny dim stuff in the image so I would say a great effort.  

    Alan

  4. My personal experience is that the camera live view screen (even better if it flips out) is miles better for focusing that any PC screen can manage, use the x 5 then x 10 zoom options and focus on the realy dim stars (these wont show up till focus is very close to optimal).

    I expect I will get flak for this but do try it and check the in camera settings for ISO which should be temporarily turned high/shutter speed to 20 Seconds and play with the live view screen simulator options too, after focus is set then change the settings to the required positions.

    Alan

     

    • Like 2
  5. 2 minutes ago, SilverAstro said:

    True !  I am conflicted on this junk / novelty aspect.

    Every satellite needs, now, to have an end of life plan. Usually to de-orbit and burn up. So by rights the final burn should have been to lower perigee to cause the no longer needed dummy load to return to Earth, not to raise its apogee to 'out there'  ???

     

    I wouldn't be surprised that at sometime in the future that Mr Musk will re capture the car and return it to Earth, after all that sort of mission will be vital for any Mars exploration.

    Alan

    • Like 1
  6. 39 minutes ago, bingevader said:

    Sorry, I'm with the, "Yet more space junk!" brigade.

    Just because he can, doesn't mean he has to....

    It was either a nice shiny car or a block of concrete, the ship needed a payload of some description...I know what I would choose.

    Alan

    • Like 2
  7. 2 minutes ago, Peco4321 said:

    I just can't stop being amazed by this. I know the marketing machine is doing extremely well here, but the images are breathtaking. IMG_6230.thumb.PNG.6ad2765eddc333cfcc17349722692860.PNG

    IMG_6233.thumb.PNG.fe3bb5d3807bc122f782d9a464d2b476.PNG

    IMG_6234.thumb.PNG.1e0f79653812fbf125746cc0d3206220.PNG

     

    Agreed but what a marketing ploy the first car in space but well deserved, has to be better than another spy satellite though.

    Alan

  8. 6 minutes ago, catman161 said:

    I initially started out doing something very similar but in a much more crude way years ago by fitting a plumbing part called an end stop to a Nikon right angle finder and just push fitting it over the polar scope on my old NEQ6 - worked a treat. Now I use a QHY pole master camera. No more achy back or cold/wet knees :) 

    The pole master has certainly improved things but the simple RA finder is still useful for portable mounts like the Star Adventurer especially if running it unteathered etc.

    Alan

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.