Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Alien 13

Members
  • Posts

    6,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alien 13

  1. I dont know much about the Canon M100 but provided it has bulb mode and a remote shutter connector it should work but the most often recommended starter cameras are the 450D which was the first model with liveview and the 600D because of its articulated view screen.

    Recommended sites for used cameras are MPB photographic and WEX.

    Alan

  2. 1 minute ago, vlaiv said:

    Issue with Mak is that you really can't speed it up significantly. Well, maybe you can but we don't have adequate focal reducer available.

    It is also baffled "tight" - illuminated field is not very great.

    At 6" people might start to feel boxed in as that is already 1800mm of focal length.

    C6 on the other hand can do planets. Maybe not as good as Mak150, but I don't think it will necessarily be much worse.

    It can image planets - we know that most of planetary imaging is done on large cats.

    One can purchase this:

    https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p11425_Starizona-Night-Owl-2--0-4x-Focal-Reducer---Corrector-for-SC-Telescopes.html

    and get F/4 imaging "machine" that can illuminate 16mm field - that means ASI183 and ASI533 on 6" aperture and 600mm FL - not bad.

    It is extremely light scope at 3.7Kg - I bet it can be mounted on AzGTI.

    If it was reasonably priced - I think it could do well as all around scope for beginners - but it is very expensive (not twice expensive in comparison to Mak150  like 5" counterparts - but still, quite expensive for 6" scope).

     

    From memory the 90mm Questar Mak does things a little different, probably the best scope ever made, well to me anyway.

    Alan

    • Like 1
  3. 25 minutes ago, Robindonne said:

    Thx.  Yes that was what i was hoping for.  A bit protection is fine for me. Im not that fanatic to go out in the rain i think. But should i go for pro models? To have longer cameralife?   I really have no idea what situations you can get in at night.  I  have seen some pictures of frozen equipment etc.  But drying electronics in the open indoor should do well i think?

    I think you just have to cautious with any electronic kit in bad weather, as for the pro models they are only weather proof if using a pro L lens. There are lots of ways to minimize the effects of rain etc with suitable covers or even a plastic bag.

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
  4. 10 minutes ago, Robindonne said:

    Oh so shouldnt trust this info anymore from versus.com.  I actually used it a lot for comparing.  Im going to look into its reliability.  Dont want to be surprised after buying it.  “Weerbestendig” is our word for weatherproof and “stof- en waterbestendig” is translated dust and waterproof.  But i will definately check some other sources after you provided Me other info.  Thx

    2A8D4962-E320-4C43-BBBB-2B406DFBE332.png

    The Canon 60D and 80D for that matter are weather sealed and considered dust and splash proof but dont offer quite the protection of the pro models.

    Alan

     

    • Thanks 1
  5. 12 minutes ago, Robindonne said:

    Ok.  Do you use one?  Do you suggest to search for a wireless one?  My first idea was, if canon never made a complete model, to look for wired.  Just because, batteries and a free hotshoe for a rdf maybe?!  Im not really fanatic on daytime photography so probably never gonna make a family-picture from a long distance.  Actually never make family-pictures anyway😬. And phones are always present for these unique moments

    I did have a Giga T pro and it was great as you could program two sequences and link them but upgraded it, I wouldn't worry too much about wireless options as a cheap plug in will do most of what you need and pretty much compatible with any camera post 450D era.

    Although I have the ability to use my camera via an app over wifi or a remote shutter system I still love my diy wired shutter release the best..

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
  6. 12 minutes ago, Robindonne said:

    Yes so a remotecontrol is probably the best option.  I will look into the different given options then.  Unfortunately.  If canon didnt make a model with these features combined then there is no other way to buy one of the remotes.  The magic lantarn sounds familiar. Ill have a look ofcourse but when its capable of programming series of long exposure times then i guess any canon will have that option? Or are some models excluded?   And due to the lack of a list with dslr’s who have this option im still curious if someone can advice me.  Thx.  Dankjewel

    I can only assume that the XXD and XD models are the ones that have made any attempt at an internal intervalometer, its worth noting that even expensive external options like the Giga T pro 2 cant do it all and still rely on some internal camera timer settings if you want to include mirror lock up for example into the sequence.

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
  7. I dont think any Canon camera has the full capabilities of a standalone intervalometer built in, my Canon 80D has most of its features but not all although enough for time lapse/star trails etc.

    You can use "Magic Lantern" firmware on some Canon cameras to expand the capabilities with its internal timer settings.

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.