Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

wookie1965

Members
  • Posts

    8,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by wookie1965

  1. 3 hours ago, symmetal said:

    You don't want to run the resistors near their maximum rating as they will be too hot to touch in free air and could cause localized hot spots around the scope.

    To dissipate 0.2W per resistor (using 0.25W resistors) rearranging Ohm's law R = V^2/W = 12* 12 / 0.2 = 720 ohms. 750 ohms is the closest preferred value which would dissipate 0.19 Watts. If you have a stock of 330 ohm resistors you want to use up, you could put 2 in series for each 'rung' of the ladder where each rung would dissipate 0.22W (that is 0.11W per resistor).

    If using 750 ohm resistors for each rung to dissipate 8W in total (from the above chart) you would need 8/0.19 total resistors = 42

    If using 2 x 330 ohms in series for each rung, you would need 8/0.22 rungs = 36 rungs. So 72 resistors in total.

    A 5" scope has a circumference of around 16" which is 40cm. So the 750 ohm resistors would then be spaced 40/42 cm apart or 0.95cm apart. :smile:

    Using 2 x 330 ohm rungs each rung would be spaced 1.1cm apart.

    Alan

     

    Mine measures 48cm around the objective on its dew shield. 

  2. 34 minutes ago, Cornelius Varley said:

    Do any of the tubes unscrew ? It could be that you don't need all of them to reach focus.

    I thought that but op tried and could not reach focus with them all in he had to pull the eyepiece out a bit to achieve focus. He has now used a Barlow without the lens and is getting focus so definitely needs that extra piece. 

  3. Nick has transformed my viewing until I had met him I had been using "Turn left to Orion" looking for the galaxies. 

    Disappointed at my lack of seeing anything apart from M45 and M42 I was about to pack it all in. 

    So when I met him he put me on the track of clusters and double and multiple star's, 

    This renewed my interest and now having the EQ5 and two refractors on clear nights I am spoiled for choice of the thousands of objects I care to view now I am in my element. 

    So it's all thanks to Nick who I cannot thank enough. 

    • Like 3
  4. 36 minutes ago, RobH2020 said:

    Hmm so maybe i don't need a moon filter after all if i can just do this!

    If we're reducing the aperture by using that little cap, that massively increases the f ratio of the scope right? What are the implications of that?

    As far as I know makes no difference looking at the moon you would just be able to see the craters and mares rather than a blinding light.

  5. If you live in light polluted area dont think you are going to see galaxies galore in technicolor you wont, you will only be able to see the brighter ones M81,M82, Andromeda when that comes back(M31) look for clusters both globular and open as well as double stars.

    The galaxies will be grey but clusters have different coloured stars and so do the double and multiple stars leave the galaxy hunting for dark sky areas this will make you enjoy the hobby and not put you off when you cannot see anything.  

  6. 3 months nearly since I have been out weather has been terrible everytime set up cloud rolled in frustrating is not the word. Puppis is a no go for me I have houses all around and 3 story ones at the back of me I am lucky see anything.

    Great report Nick I wont be copying your Puppis targets as explained 😪

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.