Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

johninderby

Beyond the Event Horizon
  • Posts

    15,408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    78

Posts posted by johninderby

  1. A CPC800  would be something to consider. Bit of a big and heavy mount but rock solid. No worrys with wobbling or vibration and can be picked up second hand a a good price. Something I would go for over the 8SE although you loose portability.

    the 6SE will be a good choice which I’m sure you will be happy with.

    • Like 1
  2. The 8SE is OK. Yes the OTA is at the limit of what the mount can carry but still usable. Biggest improvement was fitting a FeatherTouch microfocuser that replaces the stock focus knob. When using it to fine focus the scope didn’t wobble at all. Downside is that the microfocuser is now silly money.

  3. The oldish ones came in regular Starbright and Starbright XLT versions. The ones with the XLT coatings are a bit better but the regular ones are still OK. Biggest difference is price. The ones without the XLT coatings aren’t as desireable so sell for less. 

    There will be a label on the tube that tell you which coating it has. If it just says Starbright then it it is just the plain Starbright coatings. It will say Starbright XLT if it is.

    • Like 1
  4. Having had a 127SLT and a an 8SE I’m famiiar with both mounts. I found the 127 to be just adequate on the SLT mount and think while the 6 SCT OTA  would work have my doubts about the stability. The SE mount is much sturdier with better features and will be far more stable with the 6 OTA.

    It’s the stability issue that concerns ne about the 6SLT. I’ve been looking for proper reviews of it but yet to find one. There is a bit of a review on FLOs website but does confirm my concerns. 

    ”The mount is light which is great for transport but indeed will wobble a bit when focusing. It will settle down after a few seconds and stays stable after. It might be a bit tricky when focusing but if you get the trick it is no big deal.”

    • Like 1
  5. 3 minutes ago, sarahsmiffy said:

    Alot of people seem to be recommending the skywatcher dobsonian, are they not awkward to use ?

    They are actually about the easiest type of scope to use. Takes about a minute to learn how to use one. Not as easy to carry but still no problem for most people.

    I find a height adjutable stool makes it comfortable to use while seated.

  6. This inexpensive one is actually pretty good and better yet cheap. Works well and I had one although now upgraded to the Celestron one. Would get this one for now.

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mobile-Smart-Phone-Telescope-Adapter-Holder-Mount-Bracket-Spotting-Scope-Adapter/362721881464?hash=item5473e8ad78:g:GVkAAOSwg5tdTUpI

    The Celestron one is easier to adjust but several times the price. Perhaps something to consider for the fiture.

    https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/celestron-nexyz.html#SID=24

  7. Best advice I could give to the beginner on your budget is keep it simple.  Would strongly advise against a cheap EQ mount. More trouble than they are worth.

    On your budget a dob or another scope on an alt-az mount is the most practical and the easiest to get started with. A achromatic refractor or a small maksutov or newtonian still gives a lot of options.

     

    • Like 2
  8. It takes standard 1.25” eyepieces and you will be able to attach a phone to it. 

    Long focal length so best on moon and planets but will also be able to see DSOs (deep space objects) although the field of view isn’t wide enough to take in the bigger objects. 

    With these acrhomatic scopes long focal lengths are popular as it reduces CA (chromatic aberation) which is the false colour around objects. 

    At this price range you won’t be able to get a really good scope but more of a usable beginners scope. It actually comes with a decent 26mm eyepiece unlike most beginners scopes though although you’ll probably want another eyepiece of about 10mm.

  9. 4 minutes ago, sarahsmiffy said:

    Thanks so which one you recommend for a beginner who wants to find way around the sky, enjoy a bit of everything and take the odd pic of the moon ?

     

    https://www.telescopehouse.com/bresser-messier-ar-80-640-az-nano-telescope.html                             

    (no youtube videos of this for me to see)

     

    https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/skywatcher-evostar-90mm-az3-telescope.html

    https://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/skywatcher-startravel-102-az3-telescope.html

    Yes that would be a better choice .BTW Telescope House ( Bresser UK) ships everything from Germany whereas Harrison ships from the UK and their shipping is cheaper.

    https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/bresser-messier-ar-80.html#SID=1683

  10. One thing to note the cheap scopes from all manufacturers are not good quality and  have flimsy mounts so doesn’t matter which brand you choose. Those cheap scopes can put a beginner right off the hobby.

    BTW Celestron makes some very fine scopes and is well regarded. 

    Astrophotography is often mentioned by beginners but can get seriously expensive. However get a smartphone adapter to fit your smartphone to the telescope and you can take lunar or planetary photos on a tight budget even with a dobsonian..A good place to start.

    On your budget a dobsonian will show you more than any cheap scope on a wobbly mount. Get a height adjustable  stool to sit on and makes observing with a dob more comfortable.

    This is a great beginners scope.

    https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-skyliner-150p-dobsonian.html

    This is one of the most popular beginners scope although also used by experienced observers.

    https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-skyliner-200p-dobsonian.html

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.