Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Beardy30

Members
  • Posts

    1,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beardy30

  1. No me neither but having a Seestar myself I’d still be tempted at some point by the celesteon
  2. Sorry I meant price aside capabilities wise and quality wise obviously- be interested to see if it’s worth the upgrade
  3. I wonder how one of these would compare to the Seestar https://www.firstlightoptics.com/rowe-ackermann/celestron-origin-intelligent-home-observatory.html
  4. I have a steel tripod not sure if that will make a difference
  5. Has anyone ever fitted this to the AZI GTI mount - the know its over payload but for visual only could it work ? Possibly with a RDF instead of the finder scope to reduce weight ?
  6. I had a 127 and my 4” Achro beat it hands down for me so I’m not surprised there
  7. Thanks guys interesting indeed that they are preferable to a 127 Mak - thanks
  8. Has anyone ever compared these two scopes for dSO and planetary - I’m assuming the Mak will win outright for planetary and lunar but it would be good know if anyone has ever compared both side by side and which comes out as the best all rounder
  9. Has anyone ever used one of these with the kids and if so what’s the verdict on them ?
  10. Yea I thought that might be the case - think I’ll avoid a Mak in future for this reason
  11. Fries anyone know if it’s possible to fit a Crawford style Focuser into the 127 Mak rather than having to use that awful Focuser knob ??
  12. I went for the 102 startravel on the azi GTI - personally I found it frustrating and have since ditched my 224mc camera and I’ve bought a Seestar s50 - it’s so simple to use I’d recommend it, however I also Like my 102 - not a high end scope but it does a good job visually
  13. hello and welcome from Preston
  14. fantastic choice, im over in Preston , could do with this weather shifting!
  15. Hi - I would highly recommend the Sky-Watcher Star Travel 102, yes you will get some chromatic aberration at that price point but it’s not as bad as you may think, it is however a superb scope that is hassle free and gives great wide field views of stars etc I have one and recently sold my 127 as it could t get a look in on the 102 by comparison- just my personal perception of course. I had some impressive views of Jupiter which blew me away to be honest which gave a lasting impression. Mount wise you’ll struggle so I’d recommend looking at this separately personally- I went for the AZI GTI - and I’ve not regretted it
  16. I’ve never used Samsung personally so cannot comment sorry
  17. I use an iPhone 13 currently but I’m eventually going for a dougee T20 from Amazon they are very compatible and affordable at £140
  18. Finished this evening with a shot of Capella - 3min-10 secs of data - 10second exposures. Wasn’t able to get anything else, moon too bright and light pollution saw to that but not bad tbh quite pleased with the image for my first go
  19. First moon shots with the SeeStar and it had to be done with the full moon tonight ight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.