Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Beardy30

Members
  • Posts

    1,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beardy30

  1. Nice images . Has anyone noticed how improvements kick in after any particular time /exposures time - I have certainly noticed everyone it doubles it improves 10/20/40/80 etc ..what have others experienced?
  2. Some shots from last night of the moon, Pinwheel, Whirlpool and M31
  3. On consideration I think a family holiday in spain or one of its islands is the way forward
  4. Greenland’s not an option really for me as I’m hoping to make a family break of it - I image well opt for Spain 🇪🇸
  5. Hi all Where do you recommend for the 2026 eclipse- Spain (lower horizon but chance of clear skys and warmer) or Iceland - sun high in the sky but weather more risky cloud wise ?
  6. has anyone use the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 for the SeeStar i wonder how it compared technically to the Ipad 2022 model - as ive always preferred the simplisity of the Ipad/Apple devices personally
  7. Fabulous images I love the Seestar so much I do t seriously think I’ll ever use a conventional telescope again
  8. Sorry perhaps my question was poorly worded, I get the S50 wins for certain economic/ capability reason but my question was more around if anyone has tried one of these and how good it was in comparison regardless of cost ☺️
  9. Has anyone been able to compare the Seestar to the Unistellar eVscope eQuinox ?
  10. Very very sad news - Alyn was a pioneer and and inspiration- RIP 💔
  11. The Seestar is a class bit of kit. Video of the sun ☀️taken this morning 15125379564929483542.mp4
  12. Not sure why you would want to add it to an EQ mount , such short exposure time the mount will be fine as is - performs well as it’s intended imo
  13. Have a look at the above thread
  14. Tbf it’s not all that bad - personally had some good results on Jupiter
  15. Thanks think I’ll just use the Seestar 👍🏼
  16. Hi, what camera would be recommended for lunar and planetary other than the zwo 224, recently sold mind as it was not great imo in terms of image quality
  17. Having read the spec and looked into the various coating grades I feel bosun is right and that the celestron has low grade coatings than the skymax
  18. Hi could someone recommend an upgrade to the zwo 224mc for planets and the moon predominantly
  19. I’ll be surprised if there’s any difference
  20. just out of interest im assuming the celestron 27 eq astromaster Mak is the same as the SW 127 but a good lot cheaper? it would therefore be more economical to buy this version and ditch the mount and add the OTA to an existing axi gti mount
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.