Caz Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 At approx 12.35am this morning, James and I witnessed something floating across the northern part of the sky, it was brighter than Venus, and approx the size of Jupes with the naked eye. James informs me it travelled from Camelopardalis heading toward the Lynx then disappeared. Whats cool about this siting is, James was on the phone to me 65 mile away, but we spotted the same object, it disappeared from my view first then at James' location! We have no idea what it was....So the question is, what was it? Answers on a post card please... ps... and no it wasn't an iridium flare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambermile Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 ISS most likely. Seems to be around here a lot lately.Arthur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambermile Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 Ah. Must've been the green ones after all then... ArthurPS - this obviously means I am out of rational ideas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 ... James informs me it travelled from Camelopardalis heading toward the Lynx Showoff It was probably, according to StarryNight, the Orbview 2 (Seastar) satellite. At its brightest it would have been about 0.6 magnitude, overhead around Cygnus, fading until it dissapeared in the North at Lynx at about 1am. (Everything else is too faint and travelling in the wrong direction).http://tinyurl.com/okxvu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerbell Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 Lo CazIf your timing is correct the only Sat it could be is the Cosmos 1656 r/b(2).Object name: COSMOS 1656 R/B(2)Magnitude: 0.0Equatorial: RA: 07h 03m 50s Dec: +66°46'57"(current)Equatorial 2000: RA: 07h 03m 11s Dec: +66°47'32"Horizon: Azim: 354°08'22" Alt: +32°02'45"Phase (%): 0.00RA rate (arcsecs/sec): -1515.7905Dec rate (arcsecs/sec): 664.0078Click distance: 2.0000Celestial type: 40Index: 50Satellite name: COSMOS 1656 R/B(2) (#15772U)Satellite TLE1: 1 15772U 85042D 06183.82098045 -.00000148 00000-0 -46435-4 0 1235Satellite TLE2: 2 15772 71.1061 135.8473 0035202 144.9893 215.3558 14.20635467 92942Latitude: 64°02'20"Longitude: 03°35'22"Earth altitude: 813.2732Range: 1358.6687Range rate: -4.3092Depth of eclipse: 786.5333It will be underlit as it heads for the Northwest horizon, maybee its panels were positioned just right :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerbell Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 Lo CazIn the northern sky at that time of night it is still quite light up here so that all the carp in the atmosphere could change the appearance of the Sat.Also could have been doing a controlled roll to re-orientate the panels. How fast was it moving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 Yes it was Slower than a Sat not just because of the Position in the sky either strange really :?Checking the Locations of each sat none have come up trumps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerbell Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 How fast was it moving.Hard to say really, but at a guess, slightly slower than a SAT...... That probably means it was a Sat. Anything rising from or descending to the horizon always seems to be travelling slowly compares with stuff seen overhead.Just had a thought, has there been any launches recently it could be a stage of a launch vehicle or a new Sat being pushed into its new orbit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerbell Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 I Have just done a quick check on the latest launches and non of them fit the flight profile of what You have seen.So it seems to be a mystery. :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted July 3, 2006 Share Posted July 3, 2006 Things is i have traced the Sat's and none well known Sats have lined up with what was observed the size and speed dont match up with a Sat either tiz a Strange one.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warthog Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 If it was nything but a satellite, both Caz and James wouldn't have seen it. There are some uncatalogued military satellites up there, playing cowboys and indians with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 So, a UFO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 There are some uncatalogued military satellites up there, playing cowboys and indians with us.It was john wayne shaped :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroman Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 I'm guessing a weather balloon, or scientific package on a balloon of some sort. You don't mention how fast it was moving. (?) It'd be easily visible from the distances mentioned, and could have been very far away indeed, even hundreds of miles, but being very, very high in altitude, may seem to move and disappear. I've seen these type of balloons in the States-they're enormous, hundreds of feet high. I watched one on my 1.25 hour journey to work one morning, and it remained visible for another hour. Turned out, it was heading more or less straight for me the whole time. Another one was seen much closer up, drifting above the Grand Canyon star party a few years back. We all just stood there gawking, so I asked, "Say, anyone have a telescope or long camera lens handy?" You should have seen the scramble after that. Again, just a wild guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 Astroman, it was slower than a Sat. Hadn't thought about a weather balloon you maybe onto something with that ThanksJames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.