Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

M101 plus UFOs


Recommended Posts

You've also got some Turquoise pacmen :D - the wind I reckon. Had a little play cos I need all the practice I can get. Filters/noise/dust & scratches, radius 2 and move the threshold as far right as possible before the hot pixels reappear. This smooths out the wonky stars a bit. Then a bit of a histogram stretch, hue reduction and despeckle. A little bit of lassooing.

I guess from looking at the pixels that you used 3 subs. It's so tricky M101 - there is so little light showing up against the background sky.

Showing up well CC - just need a few more subs. Well done for perseverance grabbing the opportunity to get out

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CC, is there a hot pixel removing piece of Software for your Camera? i ask as i had one for my Nikon coolpix and it worked a treat!

As Martin has said it does look like the image has been affected by wind rather than out of focus, those stars look too tight really for it to be out of focus..

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James, yes there is and I could do dark frame subtraction but I decided instead to ditch the image and try again another time. The wind wobble is too severe to rescue anything I think. I just posted it as I thought it would a) give us a laugh and :D show some hot pixels to talk about.

Thank goodness its the wind and not me making a mess of the image.

Next job, do shorter subs and / or try the noise reduction in camera and, of course, try again when its not windy.

BTW, anybody know if Newts are prone to wind movement more because of their size? I'm guessing yes, 'cos it's like a sail, and would a solid pier help, or does the OTA flex?

Captain Chaos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next job, do shorter subs and / or try the noise reduction in camera and, of course, try again when its not windy.

I think you need the longest exposures your set up will allow for something like M101 in order to bring out faint detail and to keep the noise down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, the coloured dots are hot pixels on the DSLR chip. The pattern comes from Registax lining up the image rather than the frame so the pattern gets repeated throughout the image.

Thanks CC,

Thats a lot of hot pixels! (Even allowing for Registax having duplicated them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CC, the software i used for my Nikon coolpix let you RE-MAP the hot pixel array on ya imaging chip, after the first go all Hotpixels were removed from the camera and i didnt get any Hot pixels anymore(Even 1yr later). The software wasnt devoloped by Nikon it was a third party software company maybe worth a look arounf the Net for one CC...

James :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've considered a remap but that could mess up the normal working of the camera. At less than a minute exposures the hot pixels aren't a problem and can be sorted out easily if they are. The remapping for several minute exposures might not be all good.

I'm currently working out a way to get the Newt. to focus with a 2x focal reducer when using the SC3. This would then let me snap this fuzzy (albeit in monochrome) once and for all.

Captain Chaos

(laser collimater in the post for moving the primary up the tube)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.