Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

are my stars too large


Recommended Posts

well just moved over from my 400mm scope to my 2032 mm c8 edge which might not help ,do you think my stars are large or is it that im just used to my 400mm scopes images,scope was focused well ,any comments please,its a 300sec lum sub stretched  thanks

 

1254282117_testCigarGalaxy.thumb.png.119873fdf9cb3244dedb31a15286f5fb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they're a bit big and a little distorted, probably just because collimation needs a tweak. It should be easy on an SCT with spherical primary. They are slightly cometary with upward pointing tails. For some reason most SCTs used for DS imaging do produce rather large stars but they can be held down in processing. Here I tried to reduce their size and render them round using a couple of Photoshop tweaks. This is just from a screen job so it could be done much better on the TIFF.

1123420529_Starsize.JPG.1b5232ee459398ae5d190efcd67915e0.JPG

Olly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks olly,still trying to get the collimation bang on ,would you say my backfocus  and focus look ok though,will give it another go tonight.Just looked on astrobin and seems common with the c8 edge on the cigar galaxy size wise

 

 

Edited by iwols
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does look a bit soft to my eye, I  don't see doughnuts but I do wonder about the focus. Are you using a quantitative metric for that?

Just for kicks and giggles, I also  took a run at the  JPEG, using Topaz Sharpen AI and  pulling the  slider over till it screamed "please don't  hurt  me". It did yield a bit more detail, at the cost of my burden of guilt.

1123420529_Starsize.JPG.1b5232ee459398ae5d190efcd67915e0-SAI-motion.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/05/2021 at 14:22, iwols said:

thanks olly,still trying to get the collimation bang on ,would you say my backfocus  and focus look ok though,will give it another go tonight.Just looked on astrobin and seems common with the c8 edge on the cigar galaxy size wise

 

 

Until you have collimation nailed I don't think it's possible to comment on focus but I don't see any reason to doubt backfocus here.

Olly

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple answer:

The same star with your 400mm scope and with your 2000mm scope, the star in the 2000mm scope will be 2000/400 = 5 times larger ?

I know all stars are point objects to our measly little scopes, but optics come into it too.

Michael

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.