Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

What is wrong with these stars?


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, happy-kat said:

reading other posts suggest it doesn't impact.

There are many posts suggesting that adding a clip-in filter will correct Autofocus after an Astro Mod to a DSLR .

If it does (????),  it must be because of refraction, as vlaiv has demonstrated.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a go at M42 with an IR block filter added. From my garden I can only collect 20 minutes of data and the gradient is from a near-by street light. The stars might be slightly rounder, but I don't seem to get good focus with the IR block in place?? Next clear night I will have another try with my Wratten 29 filter. It should reduce the gradient and remove all the shorter wavelengths. I think in the ye olde film days Wratten 29 were used for photographing Ha regions.

129498921_2456782384615438_205935583449136267_o.thumb.jpg.1e4388fcf83e3c70a58f810431ce0655.jpg

Edited by Ags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ags said:

The stars might be slightly rounder, but I don't seem to get good focus with the IR block in place??

Well, yes, that is the problem with lens that have chromatic aberration - always some wavelengths of light out of focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vlaiv said:

Well, yes, that is the problem with lens that have chromatic aberration - always some wavelengths of light out of focus.

Not sure that's the reason - I have reduced the range of wavelengths so there should be a point of focus that is at least as good as without the filter, but with the (very cheap) Meade IR filter  I get irreparably soft stars.

@happy-kat the lens is still a F2.8, but I have some step-down rings coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Ags said:

Not sure that's the reason - I have reduced the range of wavelengths so there should be a point of focus that is at least as good as without the filter, but with the (very cheap) Meade IR filter  I get irreparably soft stars.

@happy-kat the lens is still a F2.8, but I have some step-down rings coming.

image.png.24fc198496b29ba5321c5909eab506eb.png

Look at these stars - there is little point in the center of each of them - that is part of spectrum that is in focus.

image.png.f876962d78960ed556e6befcbcc6b657.png

This is star from first image. Only difference is that you have wider "skirt" of the star because of UV and IR light that has not been filtered out. Filter out far parts of spectrum (reduces skirt) and stretch a bit more and you have the same star as above.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to compare the images - Orion was binned and stretched much more and shot at different gain...

My step-down rings arrived today - I can now shoot at F3.8 and F3.3.

Looking at getting a Yongnuo 100/2.0. Apparently optics are good but autofocus which I don't need is bad. Also focusing at infinity may be easier with a non-macro lens (macro lenses are geared for fast focus travel over a very large range). If I can coax good performance out of my 100 Macro, then i can start dreaming of a dual camera setup....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.