Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Celestron StarSense Accessory for Sky-Watcher Mounts


Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

I am thinking about getting the Celestron StarSense Accessory for Sky-Watcher but l am a bit puzzled as I see people talking about a WiFi adaptor too? Is this something else I need in order for the star sense to work on my SW Mac 127?

16024049268303907212647824784498.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The StarSense I have (different scope), provides a camera and new hand controller (that contains software to run the camera and also duplicates most of the functionality you already have in your existing controller). This is enough to use StarSense's alignment abilities. It doesn't need WiFi to operate.

If you had WiFi as well (built into the mount, or an additional adapter), you then have the ability to connect to a phone or tablet of some kind and use a planetarium program such as SkySafari. Personally I love that way of working as it makes navigating so much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Starwatcher2001 said:

The StarSense I have (different scope), provides a camera and new hand controller (that contains software to run the camera and also duplicates most of the functionality you already have in your existing controller). This is enough to use StarSense's alignment abilities. It doesn't need WiFi to operate.

If you had WiFi as well (built into the mount, or an additional adapter), you then have the ability to connect to a phone or tablet of some kind and use a planetarium program such as SkySafari. Personally I love that way of working as it makes navigating so much easier.

Thanks Mark, just the answer I was hoping to hear. 

Cheers. 

Edited by Jimmy Rocket
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

StarSense is quite expensive and does have it's own learning curve when you first get it, but for me it's a time-saver. I set up my scope and set StarSense going, and then bring out my eyepiece case, chair, coffee etc. By the time I'm ready to observe, it's finished aligning and I can just slew to the first target of the night. The only other prep I do is bringing my tube outside for an hour before-hand to cool to ambient temperature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

On 11/10/2020 at 09:29, Jimmy Rocket said:

Hi all, 

I am thinking about getting the Celestron StarSense Accessory for Sky-Watcher but l am a bit puzzled as I see people talking about a WiFi adaptor too? Is this something else I need in order for the star sense to work on my SW Mac 127?

16024049268303907212647824784498.jpg

Hi Jimmy,

Did you get one? How’s it working out? I have the same scope and mount and would like to add a starsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have Synscan on my Skymax mount, and Starsense on my Skyprodigy. These mounts are very similar. The built-in camera on the Skyprodigy mount takes another 250mA - important if on batteries.

I have found that, with the Synscan "Brightest Star" option, I can complete alignment a good 45 minutes earlier; before the sky is dark enough for the Starsense to "see" enough stars for its plate solving.

The Synscan system does require a bit of prior homework, knowing the best bright stars visible from your observing position. At the moment, Mars, Altair & Vega are easy to spot, and have reasonable separation for alignment.

Geoff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

Hi all,

With moving house and decorating etc I haven't done any star gazing, in a great location now though, so this starsense kit is still silly money so looking at other options ie synscan WiFi adapter to use the skywatcher app, anyone have any thoughts or experience with this as it's one hell of a lot cheaper and the app looks much more user friendly than the original synscan hand controller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly for planning and selecting targets and using goto, a tablet or phone is easier in my experience, but I'd never be without the hand controller. Having physical buttons to feel and press is much easier to use without taking your eye away from the eyepiece, especially when scanning around an area of sky. I can't handle pressing buttons on a screen without looking at it, and the relatively bright screen is bad if you're hunting for faint galaxies. Your experience might be different of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.