Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Which tube material for pillar mount?


Chris

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I picked up a very industrial looking Meade Pillar mount which sits low down for carrying large Newtonians. However I would like the option to use it with a large achromat or SCT so looking for 4" OD tubing with around 2mm wall thickness for a taller pier.

I found Metals4U online and they have lots of choice in terms of material for 101.6mm Tube - Ali, mild steel, Stainless, Galvanized etc

I'm not sure which to choose? Leaning towards Ali, but I would like to keep it as solid as possible. It's going to be obsy based and I'm likely to stick a large refractor on it at some point. 

Any thoughts?

https://www.metals4u.co.uk/aluminium/c1/tube/c22/101.6mm-x-1.6mm-(-4-od-x-16swg-)/p2814

https://www.metals4u.co.uk/mild-steel/c6/tube/c2239/tube/c56/101.6mm-x-1.6mm-(4-x-16-swg)/p2353

 

Edited by Lockie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a pier you want something sturdy. Since you're probably not going to carry it around, choose the stiffer and heavier material. 

Can you afford this? 

https://www.metals4u.co.uk/mild-steel/c6/tube/c2239/tube/c56/152.4mm-x-3.2mm-(6-x-10-swg)/p2356

Or maybe not relevant in your situation

Edited by wimvb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wimvb said:

For a pier you want something sturdy. Since you're probably not going to carry it around, choose the stiffer and heavier material. 

Can you afford this? 

https://www.metals4u.co.uk/mild-steel/c6/tube/c2239/tube/c56/152.4mm-x-3.2mm-(6-x-10-swg)/p2356

Or maybe not relevant in your situation

Thanks, it needs to be 102mm 4" to fit the EQ mount puck, but I was looking at the 4" mild steel tube. A vote for mild steel over Ali then, cheers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted a light weight extension tube for my Tak FC100 and AZ4 tripod setup mainly so I can carry it around easily.

I already had the 16” skywatcher extension tube but it weighs a ton so I bought some aluminium tube off metals4u and it works very nicely.

If you cut it to long it will transmit vibration as aluminium obviously doesn’t have the weight of steel so I ended up at 5” as the optimum length for my setup.

FA688A3D-796B-4806-BD7C-DD392ED03A80.jpeg

06EA6D92-7D8D-4DAD-8BA4-86F708D0BEFA.jpeg

916F63A2-F6B9-4791-8BE2-18FEBC8A4F5F.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jock1958 said:

wanted a light weight extension tube for my Tak FC100 and AZ4 tripod setup mainly so I can carry it around easily.

I already had the 16” skywatcher extension tube but it weighs a ton so I bought some aluminium tube off metals4u and it works very nicely.

If you cut it to long it will transmit vibration as aluminium obviously doesn’t have the weight of steel so I ended up at 5” as the optimum length for my setup.

Looks really good Jock :) Good point regarding vibrations also, I'm going to need a 1.3 metre pier tube if I pick up a long refractor! I think I'd better go for the mild steel and just give it a couple of good coats of Hammerite to protect it.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 1.3 metre steel tube will be heavy but if you are using it in an observatory setting then I would go for steel, much more solid and a lower C of G. 

Aluminium is a much lighter and a softer material which will transmit vibration - not good at high magnification which is why I cut my tube down  from 12” to 5”.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mild steel should be the best option for a permanent pier thingy. 

Absolutly best would be casted iron tube. But its a hassle to work with. And too expensive. 

If you are not going to move it around. Consider filling it with sand. It is easy to remove. If you need to move things around. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rocket Stars said:

Mild steel should be the best option for a permanent pier thingy. 

Absolutly best would be casted iron tube. But its a hassle to work with. And too expensive. 

If you are not going to move it around. Consider filling it with sand. It is easy to remove. If you need to move things around. 

Read my mind! I have two 5 five year olds, so plenty of play sand laying about in the garden :) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lockie said:

Read my mind! I have two 5 five year olds, so plenty of play sand laying about in the garden :) 

I know what ur talking about! :) Though, my kids are about the age of moving out. (more may left to astro gear the, lol) 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.