Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.




Recommended Posts

Please can I have opinions on imaging the planets with the asi178. The price difference between normal and cooled versions is significant. So, would the cooled version give significant differences in image quality? 

Of course, if you also happen to know if one thrashes the other in DSO imaging, that might influence any decision. 

Thank you 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooled cameras are nearly always worth the extra £££ in my opinion, for what that is worth :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exposures for planetary imaging are so short that cooling is unnecessary.  For DSO imaging cooling is essential.  It costs about £300 extra.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you could look at the question from a differenti Point of view: are you looking ONLY at planetary stuff or not? 

IF you plan to use it for DSO too, then by all means go for cooling. Else, if it's for planetary only, couldn't you just get an ASI120 and save quite some money? Planets are small and the 120 is fine for those. 

Then, in my mind, uncoolded 178 makes sense only on the moon. 


Edited by FaDG

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.