Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

EQ3 Pro Synscan Supertune?


Thalestris24

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dr_Ju_ju said:

I have "tuned" my EQ3 Syscan (previous version ?). Like you, I found no direct info, so basically followed the EQ5 tuning(s) & 'downsized' ….

Ok, thanks. I thought of doing that also but wasn't sure how comparable they are under the cover. I've seen (and downloaded) Martin Pyott's videos which seem pretty comprehensive - for the eq5 pro. The thing is, though, is it worth the time and effort i.e. will it improve the eq3 pro?

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mechanics are basically similar except for scale...  as for will it improve things ?  for me it did, less 'slop', smoother movement, less backlash... 

To take it further, I would have to fit it with belt drive, as I've done on an EQ5, but as I only use an AZ-EQ6 now, & the EQ3 is for traveling, I've left it as is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me... I guess. Mainly aiming to reduce the DEC stiction and backlash.

I got the DEC nut off:

DSCN8734.thumb.JPG.c29e58c6eeabbb274d1dfbb14fb99a35.JPG

I think this gasket takes the DEC thrust!

DSCN8737.thumb.JPG.63f0d398fc536f07473d00861ba9acdd.JPG

Fitted a thrust roller race:

DSCN8738.thumb.JPG.3baf2f51eeff287189607bb427a2b3da.JPG

DSCN8739.thumb.JPG.4518e74e7335a99347b089128622dbaa.JPG

This is my grease:

DSCN8740.thumb.JPG.17cf9128cc384a22ebe7793655b44ed4.JPG

Slathered the worm wheel:

DSCN8741.thumb.JPG.e6f047b71079507e76937f8acb6ad6c2.JPG

Fitted a thrust race at the other end of the DEC spindle:

DSCN8743.thumb.JPG.89b4707062383812af163ddb6faabf0b.JPG

Added washers to adjust the worm position for the thickness of the upper roller bearing (and to keep it a bit more solid) (NB removing gasket meant this doesn't have to be as thick as the bearing.

DSCN8745.thumb.JPG.768ab768276e3b4f83e825f0f3bee8a6.JPG

Set a gratuitously crude rig to measure backlash as I tried to minimise it:

DSCN8746.thumb.JPG.0916d4a1aaaec68c40ad24f6cc47a06a.JPG

Replace the puny stepper I used for DEC with beefier one (with more steps):

DSCN8747.thumb.JPG.bb96ef11aca8400f88961d6d5df79ff3.JPG

I gave the RA axis a darn good adjusting and greasing as well. Much Binding in the Marsh no more...

DSCN8744.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr_Ju_ju said:

The mechanics are basically similar except for scale...  as for will it improve things ?  for me it did, less 'slop', smoother movement, less backlash... 

To take it further, I would have to fit it with belt drive, as I've done on an EQ5, but as I only use an AZ-EQ6 now, & the EQ3 is for traveling, I've left it as is.

Is there a commercial belt drive available? I've not heard of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.