ottoman Posted October 22, 2008 Share Posted October 22, 2008 Has anyone bought on of these before and are they anygood?http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170176591910&ssPageName=MERC_VI_RSCC_Pr4_PcY_BIN_Stores_IT&refitem=180242904277&itemcount=4&refwidgetloc=active_view_item&usedrule1=StoreCatToStoreCat&refwidgettype=cross_promot_widget&_trksid=p284.m184&_trkparms=algo%3DDR%26its%3DS%252BI%252BSS%26itu%3DISS%252BUCI%252BSI%26otn%3D4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asteria Posted October 22, 2008 Share Posted October 22, 2008 Hi there - this has a small aperture and a relatively long focal length. The type of telescope is known as a Newtonian reflector. It might be OK for Jupiter, Saturn and the Moon, but might disappoint for anything else. There are plenty of people on the forum who can advise, but most seem to suggest looking at something like this but with a minimum aperture of 130-150mm, which is around double the aperture of this scope. If you double the aperture you quadruple the light-gathering ability, so a scope with 150mm aperture will show you much more in the night sky.Good luck.Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algol Posted October 22, 2008 Share Posted October 22, 2008 i have a 130pm newt reflector and while it has given me good views, i am looking to upgrade soon, so anythin less than that may dissapoint in the long run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottoman Posted October 23, 2008 Author Share Posted October 23, 2008 i wont be going for one of those then! cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algol Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 not saying they'd be rubbish but with lp taken into account you probably be better off with a bigger starting scope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisEdu Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Like they said - go bigger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asteria Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Hi Ottoman - in general terms, the bigger the aperture the better. However, a number of other factors come into play with large scopes: portability decreases, cost goes up, storage may become an issue (let's face it, most scopes in Britain spend a long time on shelves!) and general handling (mounting, unmounting the scope) can become tricky. Big scopes also take an age to cool down, and without this time, the views can be poor.I've got a number of small scopes (none bigger than 150mm) and I'm a fan of them because all the secondary issues haven't become a big factor. I can still see a lot with them, and I think I've concluded if I want to step up from what I've got, there's not much point unless I go with a big scope (300mm or bigger). I think at this point, the gain from the bigger aperture probably begins to outweigh the cost of the secondary factors as the views will markedly be better.Having said all that, I've gone a long way in the last couple of clear nights with a pair of Meade 10x50 binos from Lidls (cost - £10-£15). Lots of enjoyment, and no big issues storage, handling, weight etc. And blumming cheap!Cheers.Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.