Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Buying a new 80mm APO should I opt for a bench test?


Recommended Posts

Legally you don't need to. Taking a more flexible approach, which I'm inclined to do, the consumer finds him or herself in a marketplace in which competing manufacturers are trying to produce premium optics at sub premium prices. They don't seem to be able to do so reliably, so some vendors offer an additional QC control. How you react to this is a personal decision. You are perfectly at liberty to say, 'Send me the standard article and if it isn't right I'll send it back.' Or you can say, 'Fair's fair, it was never possible, in the past, to obtain such good optics at so reasonable a price so I don't mind paying a bit more for an additional test.' If this test were to take place before some heavy handling by carriers, though, I'm not sure what it would be worth.

So I'd maybe pay the extra on a cut-throat priced apo but if I were buying at premium prices (TEC, Takahashi etc) I most certainly wouldn't. I'd feel I'd paid for that already.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input

Is it necessary to opt for both star and ronchi? I'm not familiar with any of them and really don't know what they mean other than giving me peace of mind knowing the scope is as good as it gets for the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the bench tests what's involved as the lens cells should be at the correct spacing in a triplet back at the factory.. in my 80ed the whole unit comes out as 1 piece...presume the triplets,quads etc are the same..collimation isn't an issue with a frac as far as I know..but if I was in your shoes,piece of mind goes a long way..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason the bench tests were introduced was to resolve those very items that in theory should not but do occur mainly due to quality control failures.

collimation can be an issue as well as lens cells that should but are not correctly set at the factory.

i think the article explains it well.

i feel that the amount involved in the bench test (by an expert) compared to the total cost of the astronomy equipment is (in my opinion) a worthwhile investment.

if it was going to be tested on an £80 scope now that’s a different matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, m.tweedy said:

The reason the bench tests were introduced was to resolve those very items that in theory should not but do occur mainly due to quality control failures.

collimation can be an issue as well as lens cells that should but are not correctly set at the factory.

i think the article explains it well.

i feel that the amount involved in the bench test (by an expert) compared to the total cost of the astronomy equipment is (in my opinion) a worthwhile investment.

if it was going to be tested on an £80 scope now that’s a different matter.

I agree!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will they guarantee that the scope you get passes a given standard?

As in if they send "your" scope for test and find it is poor does someone make adjustments such that it is improved or do you just get told "Here's your scope it isn't that good, and here's the results to prove it." :evil5:

May seem a bit of a daft question but the initial post says nothing about "tested and adjusted as deemed necessary". Mention as Skywatcher say similar when they state "Can attach a DSLR". You can attach one but that doesn't guarantee the DSLR being at the focal plane, so no image. Everyone "presumes" the DSLR will be able to collect an image but often they cannot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.