Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Orthoscopics?


Mak the Night

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

By comparison planets are really small, even at high magnification. I know some people say the view is 'cramped' but, you just don't need all that real estate. I find the small FOV concentrates you on what you should be looking at :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two 6mm Ortho's.

One is a 1.25" Circle-T and the other one is an unknown 0.965" that I use with an 1.25" adaptor. I did a quick comparison test late last year with my ETX105. Both are very good performers on Lunar/Moon and planetary targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip R said:

I have two 6mm Ortho's.

One is a 1.25" Circle-T and the other one is an unknown 0.965" that I use with an 1.25" adaptor. I did a quick comparison test late last year with my ETX105. Both are very good performers on Lunar/Moon and planetary targets.

What magnification do they give you on your Meade? I think anything below 6.25mm will give me less than a 0.5mm exit pupil on my 102mm (f/12.7) Mak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I finally got to use the 25mm Hutech ortho's in the bino on M42. The seeing wasn't what I had hoped even though the nebulae was visible with the naked eye and I soon settled on a magnification of 52x (no Barlow). I experimented with the 15mm TV Plossl pair (87x) and the 20mm WO SWAN's (65x) with and without the Neodymium filter. Before finally settling on the AH 25's plus filter.  I found that with the nebula cloud it was comparatively easy to combine the bino images than with Jupiter and settled down to some very good viewing for around an hour. Whether this was because without the Barlow the eye relief was shorter (22.2mm) or that the target was larger in area I'm not sure. Either way, the ortho's delivered a mesmerising 3D-type view of the Orion Nebula. I'm impressed!

56bbc25c0e207_AstroHutech25mmpair.jpg.fe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6 February 2016 at 16:32, Mak the Night said:

What magnification do they give you on your Meade? I think anything below 6.25mm will give me less than a 0.5mm exit pupil on my 102mm (f/12.7) Mak.

It works out at 245X with the ETX 105 (f/14) and 250X with the C6 (f/10). The downsides are eye-relief & exit pupil are 'tight', (pushing my 'scopes and eyes to the maximum limits), and the field of view is narrowed compared to a 6mm Plossl e/p.

With the TeleVue Ranger (f/6.8) it is 80X.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Philip R said:

It works out at 245X with the ETX 105 (f/14) and 250X with the C6 (f/10). Eye-relief and exit pupil are 'tight', (I cannot remember what they are). The field of view is slightly narrower, compared to a 6mm Plossl e/p.

With the TeleVue Ranger (f/6.8) it is 80X.

OK, if my maths is right, you should get an 0.47mm exit pupil on your ETX 105, 0.6mm on your C6 and 0.88mm on your TV Ranger. I think you should be able to get away with 0.47mm on the ETX. I can get a 0.47mm exit pupil on a 6mm EP for approx 217x on my Mak. It can be done and it's only technically a gnat's member under 0.5mm!

I have a 9mm WO SWAN that I can reduce to 5.625mm with a 1.6x Barlow to give me 231x giving me an 0.44mm exit pupil. I think that's pushing it a bit though lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.