Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

DSLR and Ha


Recommended Posts

You probaly would not get much difference.

It will depend on how much Ha the Ha filter passes, the Astronomic one passes very close to 100% so the in-built one is the one that chops 80%.

On a Canon the built in filter blocks 80% of the Ha passed so if 100% through from the Ha filter then you still have 80% blocked.

On a Nikon the in-built filter blocks 90%.

You need to know the pass or block of each, the result is the product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a school of thought that suggests wider bandwidth Ha filters are better suited to DSLR use so if you can get hold of a 35nm it might give better results than the ultra narrowband 3nm filters.

Anyway here's a picture with a standard DSLR and Baader 7nm Ha filter totalling 2400 seconds

Pelican Nebula Cygnus

DSIR6765_stack_noels_1024_zps1a8a2591.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a school of thought that suggests wider bandwidth Ha filters are better suited to DSLR use so if you can get hold of a 35nm it might give better results than the ultra narrowband 3nm filters

That does make sense if you think about it, if the filter is too narrow, the longer you have to expose for to get decent signal.

Long subs are the dslr's enemy due to the sensor heating up, so a 35nm would work out to be more useable :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.