cosmojaydee Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 As anybody tried imaging with a un modified Dslr using a Ha filter, what effect would this have on the image and if you have tried can you link any picsThanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 Unlikely to be very successful I'm afraid. Even modded DSLRs aren't ideal for using with Ha filters as the bayer filter (which has twice as many green pixels as red or blue) will block about 3/4 of the signal. Then the IR filter in an unmodded camera will knock out another 2/3 or so of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan_Pembs Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 True about unmodded dslrs, not so good for HA, but Astrobin have some good examples of HA filter use with modded cameras if you search for them. It's not as easy as using a ccd but you can do it with long subs 300+secs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 Yes, here's a good example taken with an Ha filter through a 50mm lens on a modded camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 You probaly would not get much difference.It will depend on how much Ha the Ha filter passes, the Astronomic one passes very close to 100% so the in-built one is the one that chops 80%.On a Canon the built in filter blocks 80% of the Ha passed so if 100% through from the Ha filter then you still have 80% blocked.On a Nikon the in-built filter blocks 90%.You need to know the pass or block of each, the result is the product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laser_jock99 Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 There's a school of thought that suggests wider bandwidth Ha filters are better suited to DSLR use so if you can get hold of a 35nm it might give better results than the ultra narrowband 3nm filters.Anyway here's a picture with a standard DSLR and Baader 7nm Ha filter totalling 2400 secondsPelican Nebula Cygnus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan_Pembs Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 There's a school of thought that suggests wider bandwidth Ha filters are better suited to DSLR use so if you can get hold of a 35nm it might give better results than the ultra narrowband 3nm filtersThat does make sense if you think about it, if the filter is too narrow, the longer you have to expose for to get decent signal.Long subs are the dslr's enemy due to the sensor heating up, so a 35nm would work out to be more useable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.