Merlin Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 I have a REVELATION 200m/f.6 Newtonian on a Dob base, acquired from TELESCOPE HOUSE a few years ago. Does anyone know if the Rev. mirrors are produced by the same maker as SKYWATCHER mirrors? Are they, in fact, identical mirrors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashtestdummy Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 I think the skywatcher ones are different.iirc someone said that the revelation scopes use gso mirrors but I stand to be corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 I also think the Revelation and GSO either are the same or have a major tie-in with each other.Don't think anyone has actually said or identified for sure who Skywatcher source their mirrors from, seen it asked a few times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadz Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Revelation, TS and i believe Meade lightbridge use GSO mirrors (Guang Shen Optics)Skywatcher are made by SyntaSent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 I suppose that Skywatcher would have to make one bit of their scopes so the mirror makes sense. It is basically an in-house product.Meade have used GSO items for some time, not sure about the present status, and TS also buy in GSO items either simply as GSO or they have them branded TS in some way.I suspect that the links between the various names would be an interesting chart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashtestdummy Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Yeah Meade defianately use the gso mirrors,my 16" lightbridge was gso.the synta ones are a little better from what I've heard but mainly because the gso ones could be hit and miss quality wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ptarmigan Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Are they, in fact, identical mirrors?- - and ensuing speculation ,,Depending upon the customer, or the size of a customer's order, might GSO make mirrors in batches and/or to a customer's spec. ?In which case the quality of a Revelation-GSO mirror might not say anything about a Mead-GSO or any other -GSO mirror,so it's all boxing in the dark maybe ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuillermoBarrancos Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Both Skywatcher and Celestron are Synta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Posted April 25, 2014 Author Share Posted April 25, 2014 Hmm, thanks chaps. My interest here is to know if Rev. mirrors are as good as SKYWATCHER optics; I've never compared a Rev. with a SKYWATCHER Newt. My SKYMAX 90 is very good for the aperture, but, of course it's a different animal, so not suitable for comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadz Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 All the digging I did before purchasing my dob (skywatcher) led me to the conclusion that on the whole they were comparable in optical performance although there were questions over the coatings on the GSO mirrors (cue the onslaught!!!) although these issues are reportedly a thing of the past. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 All the digging I did before purchasing my dob (skywatcher) led me to the conclusion that on the whole they were comparable in optical performance although there were questions over the coatings on the GSO mirrors (cue the onslaught!!!) although these issues are reportedly a thing of the past.Sent from my GT-I9300 using TapatalkI reckon thats a fair summary It's the older Revelations / GSO's that seem to have the over-coating problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.