Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M81 & M82 - Strange flat frame issue.


AlastairW

Recommended Posts

Hi

I wonder if one of you talented and knowledgeable people could kindly assist with the following issue or provide any pointers, please ? I've being having great difficulties with flats, having tried all of the prescribed methods (bar building a light box). I shot M81& M82 a couple of nights ago and in post stacking when upping the levels in GIMP (yep, on a budget) noticed some strange streaking at the bottom of the image, which is very ugly. I'm not sure if this is a problem with my flats or light pollution as the subject matter was rather low at the time of the light frame exposures. 

The flats I took were ISO1600, 1/60 on a Canon 350d in AV mode using the stretched t-shirt and laptop screen method. The flats were taken approx. 10 mins after the run of 50x50sec lights with the camera at the same focus and orientation.

The first picture is the final stack with the levels upped and the second is the histogram for one of my flats (they'll all almost identical - 30 in total).

Many thanks

Al

post-28817-0-96972500-1385640421_thumb.j

post-28817-0-20397900-1385640427_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The general gradient from bottom right up to top left looks like a sky gradient. Bodes will have been down closer to the horizon if you took the image early on.

The diagonal banding seems to be the bane of many DSLR imagers and I understand could be a bias issue.

If it's the later you're talking about then I can't help. You'll have to wait for a DSLR expert ! If it's the former issue then flats won't cure it.

Dave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks a bit like shutter artefacts to me. If the exposure is too short then the flat field will be unevenly illuminated due to the movement of the shutter. It's the best part of a year since I moved from DSLR to CCD, but from memory my flat exposures needed to be longer than 1/60s to avoid this. I used to downgrade to ISO100 for my flats for this very reason - there isn't really any need to use the same ISO for flats as you use for your Light subs as you are only trying to capture variations in the field due to vignetting / dust bunnies etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.