Rangers82 Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Having just recently bought a 127slt mak was wondering whats eye piece should I get to help me get a wider fov for the larger dso thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NGC 1502 Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 If it were me, I'd get a 32mm Plossl, and not get the cheapest. You don't really need a top notch eyepiece, because a Mak with its slow focal ratio is 'forgiving' with eyepieces.'Faster' telescopes need better eyepieces if you want a sharp to the edge of field view, but your Mak should be fine with a mid range one.Your 127 Mak will give 47x mag with a 32mm Plossl, about a 1 degree field, 2 moon diameters.There are other choices, but that's what I'd do.Hope that helps, Ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wookie1965 Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Yes id go with NGC 1502 a good 30/32mm plossl will be a good buy for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers82 Posted June 26, 2013 Author Share Posted June 26, 2013 Anyone have an idea how the celestron 32mm omni plossl ep is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronin Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 A 30/32mm plossl will also give much the same field as a 25mm BST Skyguider as they have a FoV that is 60 and plossl are 50, the extra magnification from the BST cancels out the extra FoV that it has and they come out the same.Say this as you could do worse then start collecting a set, or the longer 4, of BST's for use on that scope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 The Vixen NLP's are a good mid range Plossl choice and are priced very nicely:http://www.firstligh...-eyepieces.htmlAlso you can't go wrong with a BST eyepiece from Skies the limit which will give you an extra 10 degrees apparant field of view and they don't cost much more than the Vixen NLP's. I have to say I'm very impressed with my 8mm BST hthChris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bomberbaz Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 All the above mentioned ep's are good as i have owned or do own one of them. I do like the bst though, cracking piece of glass for the cost and the extra fov and extra eye relief makes them just that bit better than a standard plossl in my opinion. Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damnut Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Hi There,Couple of links below for you to try out, these will show the field of view for youhttp://www.stargazing.net/naa/scopemath.htmhttp://www.12dstring.me.uk/fov.htm (remember to click on the switch to visual button)Also if you have stellarium you can add in your ep's as you get them to give a feel of how things will look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronl Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 +1 for the BST Explorer "Starguider" they are very good for the money, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexB67 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 +1 for the BST Explorer "Starguider" they are very good for the money,I thoroughly enjoy the one I just got. Only had two brief uses of it though, but it was clear straight away. Next will be the 8mm BST, close enough to the 10mm stock sky-watcher achromat when FOV is taken into account to make that one pretty much redundant I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.