Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Are simple colour filters all alike?


Recommended Posts

I'm looking to pick up Wratten #47 and #58 filters in 1.25" format, ideally as cheaply as possible. Visual use only, so IR leak isn't an issue.

Looking around on ebay I see there's a fair range of prices, from no-name generics at a few quid to Meade and Lumicon filters at £20+. Anyone know if there's a significant difference or if they are all much the same? With dichroic interference filters you seem to get what you pay for, but I don't know if that's still true for basic coloured filters.

edit: apologies, I meant to post this in eyepieces not scopes/whole setups, could a mod kindly move? thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have in the past used a good many colour filters with varios cameras and I have used very expensive 'Lee' ones and many cheaper. I can't say that I ever noticed any differences. The only time that I guess you would get a difference is with the RGB filter used in Mono CCD work there will be quality difference in the transmission and colour of these will be carefully controlled. For normal light blue filter on Jupiter or yellow for that matter I don't really see any problems as to which you buy, TS do a fair selection.

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed quite big differences for visual use.

The Lumicon ones are a step up from the generic ones. Better coatings and visibly sharper.

But other than a Deep Red (#29) as a moon filter, I don't see the point of colour filters for planets unless you've got a very big dob...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks - going to use them with a Herschel wedge, not for planetary. I've read that the #47 is useful for bringing out some details, while the #58 is the poor-man's alternative to the Baader solar continuum filter.

At a cost of a few quid each I don't mind picking them up to try out, but there's no sense if the cheap ones are intrinsically rubbish. On the other hand buying a brand-name #58 is a large fraction of the price of the Baader filter, so I might as well buy the real thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used the cheapest Wratten 58 I could find with my Herschel prism and it did the job. I bought mine from Astronomica, along with a bunch of other colour filters to try. Some seemed to have condensation marks on when they arrived, which I presumed to be a result of the fact the boxes they came in were not 100% sealed. Not worth sending back but not ideal.

I've now got a Continuum, which came packaged with my 2" Herschel prism and it's a marginal improvement, but really there's not much in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they are sold with Wratten filter numbers ( which using the numbers implies ) then they SHOULD have the same colour transmission as the Wratten specs. However, there is always the possibility that there are differences in the flatness, wedge and coatings of the glass which leads to the price differences, and optical performance as noted by GREAT_BEAR above.

Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.