Gottzi Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Do you think that a Telrad would be too cumbersome on my 114mm skywatcher skyhawk?Clear skies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 It would fit OK - I've seen them used on smaller scopes than yours. If you wan't something that takes up less room on the tube try the Rigel Quikfinder. It projects 2 reticule rings rather than the Telrad's 3 but is a good finder and has a much smaller "footprint" on the scope:http://www.firstlightoptics.com/finders/rigel-quikfinder-compact-reflex-sight.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TractionMan Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Not sure how big/small the 114mm is compared to the Skywatcher Heritage 130P, but this might at least give you an idea of how big the Telrad is on a smaller scope: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim-a Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I was using a borrowed Skywatcher 114 before I bought my Lightbridge - the LB came with a telrad base so I've just cable tied the new base to the 114 to give you a feel for what it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gottzi Posted October 31, 2012 Author Share Posted October 31, 2012 Yikes! Looks quite big do you think weight would be an issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobee Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 the Telrad is 200mm in length and I think your scope is 500mm, thus it should fit just right, best get a tape measure out and see what you think?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim-a Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 its not that heavy - I think you'd be ok. The only issue might be that the telrad base will prevent you from being able to slide the tube rings up much further (in the pic above, you cant see it, but there is about 1cm clearance between the top tube ring and the base of the telrad) to balance the scope if you ever decide to buy any of the heavier eyepieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantharis Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I was taken aback by the size of mine when it arrived. Still working out how to attach it to SV102ED with a clamshell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TractionMan Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Yikes! Looks quite big do you think weight would be an issue?It's big but not heavy. Mostly made out of plastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobee Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Yikes! Looks quite big do you think weight would be an issue?the telrad is abpot 11oz in weight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobee Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 the telrad is about 11oz in weight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omahaastro Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 While I use several Telrads... I would HIGHLY recommend instead going with a Rigel Quickfinder... it weighs a tiny fraction of what a Telrad does... and has a much smaller foot print. Aside from it's dimensions... the operation is virtually identical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Scunthorpe Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 I only recently got my telrad and could not believe how light it was, but it is also mostly plastic as stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qualia Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Here's a pic of an 4" f10 with a Telrad strapped on: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.