jammo Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Hi everyone,This might sound like a silly question but i`ve just started taking images of the Milky way with my DSLR and just a tripod and i was just wondering how more detail is brought out by stacking say 10 photos of which is essentially the same shot just rotated slightly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Stacking rotates them all back into alignment - it's "stack and align" software. As a simple example - a small cloud or a moment of poor transaprency over part of the shoot will cause some data to be lost on those particular frames - but it will still be on others. Stacking and aligning brings all the data back into place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessun Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Hi jammo, Simple answer: usually a tremendous ammount! Try something like DSS and it's a joy to see an image 'grow', but it depends on your sky and camera setting I would think. The better the sky the less need to stack... but with a tripod you're limited to shortish exposures so even for a wide field image I'd imagine it's a great benefit to stack!Good luck/Jessun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammo Posted November 19, 2011 Author Share Posted November 19, 2011 Cheers guys, i`ll have to try it out, i`ve seen some wide angle millky way shots processed with DSS and they look awesome, even with my 10mm wide angle 30 seconds is about the maximum exposure time i`m happy with:)many thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beyond_Vision Posted November 19, 2011 Share Posted November 19, 2011 Here's a stacked image of mine taken in several panes which were an hour of 5 minute exposures each. It does make a great deal of difference. These images though were taken with a tracking mount so field rotation wasn't an issue. It is difficult to align the seperate panes when using a 10mm wide angle lens due to the distortion. A 20mm lens would make it a bit easier to mosiac.The stacking process will improve the signal to noise ratio of your image and allow you to stretch the data more easily.RegardsKevin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammo Posted November 20, 2011 Author Share Posted November 20, 2011 Wow Kevin that is impressive It gives me something to aspire to, you`ve compiled an amazing image there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ismangil Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Hi, I'm also starting on widefield astrophotography. I've seen many tutorials on stacking DSO subs, is there anything specific or different for widefield subs? -- Perry Ismangil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beyond_Vision Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Hi, I'm also starting on widefield astrophotography. I've seen many tutorials on stacking DSO subs, is there anything specific or different for widefield subs? -- Perry IsmangilWhen using a wide angle lens if you have any rotation between images it can be difficult to stack. You may need to apply a set amount of lens correction (available in Photoshop etc) to each sub prior to stacking. Stopping down the lens will also reduce the amount of distortion.If you have any scenery in the image it will smear when stacked. You can however composite an image of the foreground with a stacked image of the sky.Other than that the principles should be the same as DSO'sRegardsKevin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ismangil Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Thanks Kevin, that's clear! -- Perry Ismangil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.