johnkirkpatrick Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 I am getting a 300p skyliner. and was gona get a filter, the OIII or the UHC skywatcher, which is best for a larger scope? I need it to tease out more detail in galaxies and nebulae Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 Those filters won't help on galaxies - no filters do - just dark skies and aperture. On nebulae though they are very useful on certain types, notably planetary nebulae and supernova remnants. With 12" of aperture the O-III is probably the most effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemihaggis Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 i can hear a trip to loch riecawar being formed !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnkirkpatrick Posted September 23, 2011 Author Share Posted September 23, 2011 i can hear a trip to loch riecawar being formed !!sounds good, must be on your doorstep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
great_bear Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 I use the Orion Ultrablock (within the limitations that John says) (I think it came out best in a S@N review of these things...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemihaggis Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 sounds good, must be on your doorstep? its probably bout half way between us , its up high has good view all round , and boy is it dark !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umadog Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 If you don't have any LP filters already then an UHC is probably the most useful. The OIII is a slightly more specialised filter. Not all UHC filters are born equal however. Some will work better than others. Do some reading of reviews before you choose.I find it weird that neither the OIII or UHC from skywatcher helped on the veil (OIII / UHC Filters) as this is a target that is well known to respond well to OIII. I never view it without a filter in fact (even from mag 7 skies). Here's another thread you might want to read: http://stargazerslounge.com/member-equipment-reviews/89209-oiii-filter-baader-skywatcher.htmlAnother possibility are the DGM filters (Welcome To DGM Optics) Their nebular filter (NPB) is very well thought of. At least as good as Lumicon's offering and cheaper. I have one and like it a lot. Don't be put off by the weird website and the E-Bay store. They're good products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemihaggis Posted September 24, 2011 Share Posted September 24, 2011 hi john i have an astronomick lp filter , they are very good quality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnkirkpatrick Posted October 1, 2011 Author Share Posted October 1, 2011 Still not sure what to get lol, What would you get? the UHC or OIII? I will get the polarizing moon filter or is the cheap one on FLO just as good?Why is decision making always hard when it comes to astronomy. First I went gray choosing a scope, Then I pulled my hair out choosing EP's, Now the dam filters are driving me mad lol, This hobby is ment to be relaxing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnkirkpatrick Posted October 2, 2011 Author Share Posted October 2, 2011 what density do i use on moon filter for he 300p? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.