Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

iwols

Members
  • Posts

    2,038
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by iwols

  1. thanks Simon just checked and the minimum file size i have is 8gb explains why the moon captures worked ok as they were all less than a 1gb,so you stack with AutoStakkert then use registax? thanks
  2. can anyone suggest why this ser file wont open correctly in registax its just a blank screen but when i play it in ser player ,it plays fine
  3. another problem im having is when i put the ser file in registax its just a black image but when i play the ser file on its own its just like the video file i captured
  4. hi happy kat,no uv filter but using an adc which doesnt seem to do much
  5. thanks craig im capturing through a usb over lan which takes it down to usb 2 speed
  6. does anyone have a screen shot of there video for comparison please
  7. thanks they were that bad didnt bother capturing it could just make the two bands out just
  8. Hi just tried the following combi,dont know if it was poor seeing last night(although it looked clear) or is this not a good combi,trying with jupiter and na adc in line ,moon was up as well here in the uk,any thoughts thanks,also does the adc effect viewing stars
  9. hi all is an adc still essential with jupiter now its higher cheers
  10. hi all,just collimated my c8 edge with the HoTech Advanced CT Laser Collimator ,just wondered if anyone that uses one could give me feedback on my results,everything looks ok apart from the bottom laser which is slightly off centre,the secondary was ok as well thanks
  11. first image ,how can i improve thanks
  12. hi followed a you tube video to get this image but when i go to levels to add some colour it just says grey and no rgb available ,here is the screen shot if that helps,i know the image isnt brilliant but im happier than i was a few months ago in the direction im going thanks to you guys.
  13. would look so much better without the rings you might be surprised
  14. well just tried my 414ex ,is it my eyes but does this look better although im now getting what i think are newtonian rings
  15. thanks bought new but ive been told it is oversampled by a lot so may need a ccd with a larger pixel um??
  16. slightly better but not as sharp on the edge and no prominences?
  17. hi just using a quark on a 100mm quad stepped down to about 72mm with a erf filter,using a electronic focuser so i can use small steps for focusing,image taken with a screen grab ,used both an asi 178mc and asi462mc camera,think i should be getting something better any advice really appreciated thanks also tried adjusting quark with the knob on the quark
  18. Hi do i still need a uv/ir filter if i use a erf filter on the front of my quad 100mm stepped down to 75mm thanks
  19. thanks the 127 are fl1200 and f9.5 isnt the fl a bit much? cheers
  20. Hi just wondered what scope you used with your daystar quarks and any chance of a sample image thanks
  21. thanks and how do you rate your bresser against the lunt because sooner than later im going to buy a scope just for the solar imaging cheers
  22. was this with bottom one with a quark and bresser? and what do you use to step it down?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.