Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

shropshire lad

Members
  • Posts

    282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by shropshire lad

  1. 43 minutes ago, Elp said:

    What version of PS have you got? The modern ones have a similar function built in, which you can try first. Alternatively starnet is free which you can also try. It's not essential, I still process with stars in the image.

    I have the latest version 2023 , and what is the built in function please ?

     

  2. 51 minutes ago, OK Apricot said:

    I use StarXTerminator in photoshop. Very good plug in, does a great job of removing stars and leaves minimal artifacts if any. Really helps you focus on nebula, dust etc. 

    I have downloaded that plug in but it just crashes my photo shop.

     

  3. I have a Canon 80D and Skywatcher AZ-GTi in EQ mode (non guided), my question is which lens from below (and what focal length) would be best to capture NGC7000 in bortle 6 skies.

    50mm f1.8

    24-105mm f4

    70-200mm f2.8

    150-600mm f5.6-f6.8.

    Also any tips would be appreciated e.g. shutter length (t) ... iso value ... advice on extracting the best image to see the nebula colour.

    Thanks Paul

     

  4. 6 minutes ago, Nik271 said:

    I came to the similar conclusions some time ago, faced with ever increasing local light pollution:

    1. Invest in smaller and portable scopes which are to be taken to dark(er) sites as often as possible.

    2. Thankfully the Moon, planets and a few of the bright double stars are still visible.

    3. Longer term, I have planted some fast growing evergreens to block as much of my neighbours silly lights.

    and when all else fails: thick bath towel over head. 

    3. who's head yours or the neighbours ... lol

     

    • Like 2
    • Haha 8
  5. 19 hours ago, Franklin said:

    Upside down and right/left reversed. You can get right angled adaptors which will correct the upside down bit, much like a refractor used with a diagonal.

    Thanks ... so in the image below (View through polar scope) polaris is positioned between  8 & 9 oclock where through my camera lens (same as viewing with your eye) it should be placed between 2 & 3 oclock for true north.

     Is this right?

    PV.jpg.7aad0f78dafc0b57ec70557c817afba9.jpg

     

    Paul

     

  6. 35 minutes ago, AstroNebulee said:

    Nice 😊, hope it goes well tonight. I've not trued m102 before. I got 4 hours on M101 past 2 nights and trying a few cheeky subs on IC405 until it disapears over a neighbours roof, guiding is a pain tonight with the gentle breeze in my wind tunnel area. Then will go on Markarian's chain for a bit, good luck 👍

    Yes and good luck to you also.

    I was hoping to do M104 but my neighbours roof is in the way .... lol

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.