Voyager 3
-
Posts
283 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Voyager 3
-
-
Fun aside , I really like your descriptions of those clusters . I wonder what will be your say when you get a chance to look at the double cluster ..
- 1
-
Don't worry jiggy and Epick , I'm surr an IAU representative is secretly reading this thread and will do the needed .
- 1
-
I can see 2 shadows Nik .. any idea which one is the lower one ?
- 2
-
My telescope has sat unused from early September . I'm really fed up with clouds , rain and other inevitable events (exams and education) . Since I bought my telescope around 2 years ago , I haven't had a proper dark sky experience with my telescope due to curfews and restrictions.
I hope folks who joined this hobby after the COVID-19 breakout including myself get the dark sky experience!
- 1
- 2
-
The 35mm ED does look special from your image Louis . Did you use a field flattener for this ? If no , this actually looks like a terrific deal!
-
16 hours ago, John said:
Yes indeed it is
I think it indeed was your voice that he heard . 😁
-
A 16" F/4 premium dob with a premium mirror sounds like a sweet spot but also sounds like a hotspot of money .
-
-
Wonderful pun . 😁
- 1
-
1 hour ago, John said:
There have been tests of eyepiece transmission from time to time in the past.
This is rather out of date now but covers a few types:
Eyepiece(1).doc 99.5 kB · 5 downloads
As Gerry / jetstream says though, this is less critical for planetary / lunar observing.
It is interesting to note that the so called top tier planetary eyepieces all have better transmissions in the yellow-red region compared to the wide fields . A good exception is the radian , which some swear by for lunar/planetary so nothing to he surprised at .
This maybe the reason why observers feel that Jupiter/Saturn has better structures with all those orangish-creamy bands, swirls,barges stand out better in the ZAO , Pentax orthos et all .
-
Looks like @HollyHound has resumed his buying streak !
Seriously though , it is very nice to try everything and selling the stuff which is not used much ! Enjoy!
- 1
- 1
-
On 30/11/2021 at 01:05, jetstream said:
Hi Piero, does f4 level coma make threshold objects invisible outside the coma free area? Will it render detail in small PN invisible in large fast dobs?
The Nagler zoom 3-6mm is a "low" transmission eyepiece ie lower than the Delos, orthos etc. My 10mm BCO delivers more transmission than my 10mm Delos with and without a coma corrector.
Jerry :
Can you explain more on the transmission part please ? What does "low" transmission mean ? Does that mean , low contrast features are more easily seen in one than the other?
-
"Sandgroper, nickname for an inhabitant or native of Western Australia."
- 1
- 1
-
Beautiful colours ! Much better than my eyes could see .😁
-
M42 is my favourite! Maybe we should start a thread on what's your favourite Mike's sketch !!
- 1
-
Agreed tripleped! Excellent report , keep up the enthu .
- 1
-
-
And don't try to use the eyepiece glass as wine glass ... You will be fine .
-
7 hours ago, John said:
Great stuff as usual Mike
I find it fascinating that you have sketched that magnitude 13.2 star next to the Ring Nebula. I have seen it with my 100mm / 102mm refractors as well and yet the limiting magnitude for the aperture is often given as 12.8-12.9.
Personally I think the scope performance calculators "understate" the capabilities of a quality refractor
I beg to differ ..! People don't always include experience while calculating the limiting magnitude . From what I've heard and experienced , an experienced observer (like yourself and Mike) can go upto 1 magnitude deeper than a normal average vision observer . I'm mot at all surprised that you and Mike are able to pick up the 13.2 mag star ...
- 1
-
Hi Louis ,
I too haven't seen a direct comparison but @Don Pensack has tried it and maybe he will chime in .
-
Expected a good old deep sky report , but seems to be the wrong forum .
PS : Great image, well done!
-
If you don't wear glasses , the normal 6.7mm 82° ES eyepiece is in stock at Teleskop express (Germany) .
-
From the reports elsewhere , the newer LER versions don't seem to be as good as the older ES 82° series .
WARNING: Do you wear glasses ? The LER stands for Long Eye Relief , but only thing - it isn't . It has just 1 or 2mm more eye relief than the normal 82° version but it is still not suitable for glass wearers . You may have to look at the Morpheus series for comfortable eye relief without giving up much AFOV .
-
Stu nailed it . The reason why folks say the OIII is not suited to smaller apertures is because , the larger exit pupil required for the OIII to strut it's stuff , will be pretty low magnifications . Hence the nebulae will be smaller . This , is obviously a personal preference . Some folks swear that OIII below 6mm exit pupil will be a black view , while others use it upto 2mm or even lower for planetary nebulae .
UHC, being larger in bandwidth , can generally take lower exit pupils(higher magnifications) compared to OIII/H-Beta which are line filters .
PS : UHC is a combination of OIII and H-Beta lines .
Taking A Peep At Perseus And Puppis
in Observing - Reports
Posted · Edited by Voyager 3
I have .. but from my Bortle 8/9 I'm not really in a position to judge this spectacular cluster . This one's in my bucket list for a good dark sky session next .
But even then when I found it , I shouted and called my sister which I normally won't do . I was the one who picked up her jaw from the floor .. It really looked terrific . This cluster also has a few orange and red giant studded in the foreground enhancing the cluster's already immense beauty .
Edit : This cluster is also easy to find as it is very close to a line ½ the way from bright Miram ( Eta Per ) and Ruchbah ( Delta Cas ) .