Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Kon

Members
  • Posts

    3,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Kon

  1. Thanks Stu. When the data are nice, they make processing a lot easier and can hold back on the sharpening as the detaisl are already there.
  2. Thanks Roy. A lot of good advice here at SGL. I only started 2 years ago; a lot of good tips and feedback.
  3. Thanks Stuart. That's very kind thing to say. I agree it's probably my best one to date. While I was processing I remembered one of your comments that Jupiter is a gas giant and it doesn't have defined sharp edges and Geof made a similar one as well. You are both inspirational and good eyes for processing.
  4. Thanks Geof, I really appreciate this coming from you. And always great with the offline chat.
  5. Thanks Ian. I was out for nearly 2 hrs when the haze parted for that split moment. I have nearly 30 videos but nothing as good as this one. I hope you get your good seeing soon.
  6. The moon halo seems to have got a lot of attention on Saturday but it was messing with imaging; stable seeing but it was making images soft. When the haze cleared I managed to get an excellent imaging session although it only lasted for 6mins before Jupiter started boiling (most likely the warmer currents were coming). This is a 3x120s image derotation. I have been battling the urge to push it and I keep messing with the colours; thanks @geoflewisGeof for your feedback on the sharpening and for telling me to stop with the colours and post it. I also managed a 2x120s derotation of IR while the boiling started happening so a bit softer. Geof described my inital attemots as crunchy 🤪. I am very pleased with the final results. 8" Dob, manual, asi462mc or 462mm, UV/IR cut or IR pass, 2.5x TV powermate.
  7. I think 2min is ok and you could combine your 3 captures in Winjupos. By the way, 64fps seems low for this camera. What settings did you use for your capture? A small ROI will give you a much higher FPS too.
  8. Good effort on Saturn under our current conditions. Do you use an ADC, it should help quite a bit at the low elevation.
  9. Very nice Roy. It has a nice natural look to it. (I feel you might be able to tease a few more details. Worth trying Astrosurface.). I never got drizzle to work well to get more out of my images.
  10. I agree this is really nicely processed and agree with Stuart's comment. The methane is still very interesting and I would like to see what more you can get. Christopher definitely has his settings right for methane although I haven't seen any numbers regarding acquisition. I have found with my limited experience and sub par results that Anu haze kills the methane signal and you need excellent transparency. I don't think you are far off of the weather plays ball.
  11. Excellent details on the colour image; as I said in our messaging, one of your best this apparition despite the less clear sky. The IR is outstanding, so much more going on. Your methane is getting better and better. I feel you might be able to push it a bit more.
  12. Excellent image and processing Reggie. I am glad you got it.
  13. Thanks Nicolàs. Lucky imaging; a 20min ser; drift through the sensor, recentre and repeat (no pause in between). The Uranus rotation is quite slow and in my stretched image (this is a composite here) I could not see any moon trailing. I think around 30 min you do start seeing the relative rotation. I used the asi462mm as it already had the filter on but the 462mc has the same performance in IR. The settings were 32ms exposure with a histogram at 95% (gain a bit higher than normal due to hazy skies). I was at f15 with a 2.5x TV powermate. The image is resized 200%.
  14. Thank you. I am all manual, yes manual pushing and tracking for 20min; just to clarify it was a 20min ser.
  15. Thanks. I was rather surprised to see it when i processed the image (good confidence when i saw 2 other mag16 stars in my image)
  16. Thanks Stuart. There is one thing I am after but it's pushing the 8" at its limits. We shall see...
  17. Thanks Geof, you are very kind. I am really happy how this one came out in the end.
  18. After the very promising Jupiter session in IR, I tried Uranus in IR again. Despite being close to the moon and the glow, I got a very good capture. This was a 20min ser and it helped to get a good signal to even resolve the very dim Miranda (even some background stars were present in my overstretched image). The northern polar hood is showing really nicely too. My usual 8" Dob but this time with the 685nm IR pass filter. From top and clockwise: Oberon, Titania, Ariel, Umbriel and Miranda.
  19. Thanks. It was nice being out anyways, although cold.
  20. Nice first image with your new setup. Like Stuart said, the debayer might not be right?
  21. Thanks Stuart. Not great night but the IR and the to-be processed Uranus might salvage the night.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.