Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

geoflewis

Members
  • Posts

    3,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by geoflewis

  1. That's a nice 1st (2nd) attempt. As you already indicated, I'd definitely add a barlow in future. You capture spped of ~31ms seems a bit slow, so perhaps try something more like 10ms. Can you set an ROI less than your existing 3008x3008 as that would help with faster frame rate. I can't advice on dew control for your scope, but probably a shroud might help, if not some form of heater.

  2. An excellent image Avani. As other UK residents have said, we feel your pain as the weather in the UK has been pretty rubbish too, though to be fair my location on the east of the UK seems to have fared a bit better than other UK regions recently.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Kon said:

    You probably have a hint of Miranda. These rings are maybe light diffraction. Best thing is to put the info of the capture on the link I posted above and superimpose it on your image and see where the rings align.

    I did an overlay and then used the Game recorder to record me changing opacity to show how well what might be Uranus's rings align with the graphic. It looks pretty close to me. Also looks like there's a pixel of noise which just might be Miranda....

     

     

    • Like 2
  4. 1 hour ago, Kon said:

    The more data you can add the better. You can check against this https://pds-rings.seti.org/tools/viewer3_ura.shtml

    and align your image to see if you have got them. But Miranda needs and should be visible in your C14.

    So I stacked 20k frames from the 30k available, so 66% and applied a huge curves stretch in Affinity Photo - what do you think....?

     

    2023-11-11-0005_8-GDL-IR-Uranus_lapl4_ap1_F20000_Sharp90_R6(1-1-10-20-30-40)_AFP(rings).jpg.f41b18508efd7cfe50d144722e3d3f3d.jpg

    I don't see anything when I apply curves to the raw 20k stack, so I'm wondering whether the ring is just an artefact from the wavelets applied in Registax, especially given the dark ring between Uranus and the potential rings.... 🤔🤷‍♂️

  5. 1 minute ago, Space Cowboy said:

    Fantastic detail Geof! That colour shot with the moons is an absolute beauty!

    Thanks Stuart, I don't usually do Jupiter's moons wide FOV, but decided that I should give them a try. That's not far off as wide FOV as I can get with the C14.

    • Like 1
  6. Kostas,

    That's brilliant knowing the dreadful conditions that you had for this. It really is fun seeing Uranus's moons nearly 150m km away, especially when you realise that the largest of them, Titania, only has a diameter of ~1,576 km. Miranda, which is the smallest of the 5 main moons and which I have yet to capture, is not much more that a piece of space rock at a mere ~472 km, about 3/4rs the north to south dimension of England.

    • Thanks 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Kon said:

    Excellent image. Your Uranus IR alone that you have shown me is one of the best out there with the polar hood really distinct.

    Your next aim under good seeing are the rings. 😉

    Thanks Kostas,

    I only got this far because of you excellent guidance, thank you. I did keep stretching the IR image to see if any hint of the rings was there, but nothing. I really have no clue what I'd need to do to capture them, is it longer duration SER, faster or slower capture speed, different gain, etc., etc.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 3 hours ago, Pete Presland said:

    Superb capture Geof, great to see the Polar hood and moons. Was this at the Native FL ?

    Thanks Pete, effectively yes, almost native FL, but I do still have the ADC in train (mainly because I've got everythinf dialled in as is), so the rig is operating at between F12-F13 rather than the C14's native F11 (which with a moving mirror for focus is never really F11 anyway).

    • Thanks 1
  9. 7 hours ago, orion25 said:

    Great work, Geof! I'm happy just to see the little blue-green disc in my scope. I've actually taken some cool shots of Uranus with my DSLR when it was in conjunction with other planets, but, of course, no detail could be seen. I could get a hint of its color though.

    Thanks Reggie,

    The only previous time I've captured Uranus's moons was with a DSLR camera back in 2014. https://www.astrobin.com/136156/

    As the capture notes show that was using DSO capture techniques of nearly 3/4 hour in 3m exposures. Of course Uranus itself was completely overexposed and saturated white.

    • Like 1
  10. 6 minutes ago, Paul M said:

    Last night and tonight turned out to be spectacularly clear, though last night wasn't forecast to last. So I've been watching Uranus and it's moons on SkySafari for a few days.... drooling. And in the back of my mind is a vague idea of making a short animation showing, hopefully, some orbital motion over, maybe 6 hours or so. Right now is the window of maximum accessibility from my back yard.

    I don't have the gear or skill to make any realistic attempt on the disc, but I do have some experience of stacking on over exposed planets to reveal their satellites :)

    Sadly, this evening the flesh was weak and the clock was way ahead of me.

    I hope that you do it, would be great to see it 👌

    • Like 1
  11. After a lot of encouragement by Kostas @Kon,  I'm pleased to share with you my first image of Uranus showing both it's polar hood and surrounded by 4 of it's moons.

    2023-11-10-2350_7-GDL-RGB-Uranus_lapl4_ap1_F2000_Sharp90_R6(1-1-1-1-10-20)_IR-RGB_AFP(annotated).jpg.027896bb2adfab0f164842978af0b097.jpg

    This is an IR-RGB image, with the best 5000 frames from a 15m SER captured at 30ms provising all the detail. It's applied as a luminance layer to the best 2000 frames froma a 5m colour SER also captured at 30ms.

    As usual for my recent planetary images, this was captured with the ASI462MC camera through my C14 XLT.

    • Like 24
  12. 1 hour ago, yelsac said:

    Geof love the detail especially on the ir, methane looks interesting to,really nice 👍

    Thanks. Yes, the IR was so sharp that I had to dial back my normal processing a couple of times. As you say, the methane band is interesting, but I'm still learning that filter.

  13. 43 minutes ago, Kon said:

    These look fantastic. Ganymede looks excellent. A lot of details all around and excellent processing.

    The current CH4 settings seem to be working and you start pulling nice details rather than just banding. Which filter are you using?

    Thanks Kostas, I am using the ZWO CH4 filter that came with the camera - not sure what bandwidth that is. EDIT: it looks like it has a bandwidth of 20nm centred on 890nm.

  14. Another night here of good seeing allowed me to capture 3 different channel (RGB, IR & CH4) views of Jupiter with GRS, plus for a change a wider FOV colour image showing Jupiter with 2 of it's moons, which are Europa to the left and Ganymede, showing some surface features, to the right..

    2023-11-11-0028_4-GDL-WJ-RGB-LD65_AS_IA_AFP.jpg.e35989ba227660346a21306b7c5ec89d.jpg2023-11-11-0101_9-GDL-WJ-IR-LD65_AS_IA_AFP.jpg.56b6fb468825386ecd9c54b3546baf9d.jpg2023-11-11-0116_8-GDL-WJ-CH4-LD65_AS_IA_AFP.jpg.bbcb6ca6a999e8bf54090e05f2d648e6.jpg2023-11-11-0045_3-GDL-WJ-RGB-LD65_AS(v2)_IA_AFP.thumb.jpg.24aab8faf9d124be03e8a56218c1dce8.jpg

    Usual equipment - C14, ASI462MC and ADC.

    I'm still learning how to capture and process CH4 data, this one being a derotated stack of TIFFS for best 60% from each of 7x2m SERs at 100ms (10fps).

    Thanks for looking.

    • Like 12
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.