Jump to content

Space Cowboy

Members
  • Posts

    7,806
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Space Cowboy

  1. 5 hours ago, Kon said:

    I have personally found that during daylight captures I can go down to 3ms with a gain of ~400 (ASI capture), probably 80%, but as it is getting darker (maybe correlated to poor seeing/transparency) I have to up my exposures to 8-12ms to get my histogram 70-90%, not bad but fps drops quite a bit. At daylight, I tried to lower my gain by increasing the exposure but I found the images noisier. I do not image at dusk/night anymore.

    (my images are at f15)

    I suppose the three of us are using different filters wit different transmission that will affect the exposures.

    I imagine fast frame rates are your main priority considering you don't have tracking Kostas. Its easy to forget that when seeing the quality of your images.  I'm not keen on daylight as my shroud is only a camping mat so the strut ends are still open to the daylight.

    I believe you are the odd man out regarding the UV filters. I have the bessel U the same as Neil. Once again you are performing miracles with a bargain filter. 😉

  2. 27 minutes ago, neil phillips said:

    My 178 is on  30 to 60 FPS 90 to 100% gain.  

    Interesting to compare. The fps was actually 65fps for the over sampled run and 81 for the smaller undersampled captures I took. Looks like the goldielocks zone is in the middle. The nose piece I screwed on so i could remove the cover glass and attached the UV filter threw off my fl from the 585c.

    These are the 2 sizes straight out of registax and their capture details. The f ratio quoted by FC is not correct.

     

    2023-05-29-1946_3-2023-05-29-1943_2-sjg-l-ven_pipp_lapl5_ap11 dyadic actual.png

    2023-05-29-2001_2-SJG-L-Ven_lapl5_ap9 dyadic actual.png

    2023-05-29-1946_3-SJG-L-Ven.txt 2023-05-29-2001_2-SJG-L-Ven.txt

    • Like 2
  3. 1 hour ago, Kon said:

    Looks great and nice fine details. What sort of fps are you managing with the new camera? At daylight I manage 300 at 640x480 (~3.2ms exposures) for a histogram of 70-90%.

    Cheers Kostas! I didn't go mad with FPS. Had gain just below 50% so FPS was about 80-90 at 60% histo. I'll post up the capture details later. Sky was a bit hazy 

  4. 2 hours ago, Space Cowboy said:

    Quick false colour process from last night combining my new QHY462mono & colour QHY585 :

    The live view of the 462 looked like a stacked version of the old QHY5L-ii.  Seeing was once again very stable.  The 462 uv image used here was oversampled probably f20. Need to get the f ratio right.

     

     

     

    2023-05-29-1946_3-SJG-LR(G)B analy small.png

    Thanks Neil. The UV was using Gaussian wavelets.  I reckon the 462 is about 5x more sensitive than the old qhy5ll.

     

  5. Quick false colour process from last night combining my new QHY462mono & colour QHY585 :

    The live view of the 462 looked like a stacked version of the old QHY5L-ii.  Seeing was once again very stable.  The 462 uv image used here was oversampled probably f20. Need to get the f ratio right.

     

     

     

    2023-05-29-1946_3-SJG-LR(G)B analy small.png

    • Like 8
  6. 2 hours ago, Kon said:

    Very nice. Good to see similar features to what I got.  I think we are spoiled by this nice weather. 

    Thanks Kostas. New 462 mono has arrived so this will be the last Venus with the noisy old cam. Can't believe this weather!

    • Like 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, lukebl said:

    I struggle with focus too. I just focus in and out till it looks about right. Nothing scientific!

    True, it’s getting larger, but as it becomes more of a crescent there’s much less to see! Very frustrating.

    Yes, the next couple of weeks look like the sweet spot before the crescent becomes too pronounced.

  8. 17 hours ago, Kon said:

    Mine looks similar but I bring the noise down with the Denoise (0.1-0.2).

    I've been experimenting. Not keen on using too much noise reduction. Ive got 17 three minute runs from this night all very similar quality as seeing was so stable. Ran the 17 stacks back through as3. Obviously there is no planetary rotation only field rotation but at this elevation it's not much. Results aren't bad but I'll try derotation of video (purely for field rotation) and also derot of images. 

  9. 1 hour ago, neil phillips said:

    looking good lots of fine detail. look forward to the repro

    Thanks Neil. It's seems shooting in broad daylight is making noise worse. This old cam is doing my nut lol Got 40 mins worth from 35 to 25 degrees alt. 

    I shouldn't complain too much as I know there are people with tree issues 🙂

    Btw checked collimation and it was still spot on despite the kick!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.