Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

rigradio

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rigradio

  1. This is the Tamron version -> Andromeda You will find Tamron vs AT65EDQ images on that page also.
  2. SGPro + PlateSolve2, framing, centering, and start imaging less than 5min
  3. Mine is Canon 60D.Both LPF1 & LPF2 were removed (full spectrum), and replaced with Astrodon AD40 clear glass filter to protect the sensor from dust. The Astrodon AD40 has the same thickness vs LPF1+LPF2. So, no need to shift the sensor position to regain the AF lens.Filters:- Astronomik Ha 12nm for astrophotography- Astronomik UV/IR clip in for astrophotography & normal photography (CWB required)- IDAS LPS D1 for astrophotography- Kolari vision 590nm & Kenko R1 for IR photography
  4. LPF-1: Front Filter Dust removal filter Piezo element filter IR/UV block filter H-alpha pass filter Larger filter Pinkish looking filter Anti-alias filter (1) LPF-2: Rear Filter Color limiting filter White Balance filter IR/UV block filter H-alpha block filter Smaller filter Bluish looking filter Anti-alias filter (2) I don't like the LPF-1 retained. Even it blurring the image slightly, I just don't like it. But, that's just me Ketut
  5. Hi Pete, The extra £60 in the 2nd camera is for Baader BCF filter. Your Canon LPF-2 filter will be replaced with this filter. This filter has UV/IR cut to avoid star bloat if you have 'glass' in your imaging train, i.e. flattener, reducer, lens, or refractor. But, if you choose the 1st camera (£399) and have glass in your imaging train, you will be okay if you use light pollution filter with UV/IR built in. The best one is IDAS LPS-D1. So, how bad is the star bloat if you don't use light pollution filter with UV/IR built in? Google this word: "lpf1 sufficient block ir" Here the video about the star bloat: HTH Ketut
  6. @DaveS & @Olly, Well, I could be biased since I only have a dslr on my 1st day learn AP. If I have both dslr & mono ccd/cmos, will I find mono will be easier? I don't know I'm still waiting for my ASI1600-MM, it's still on the way like I said. I may find it easier than dslr when it comes, but it could be bias also since I already been doing AP with my dslr for 2yrs At least, the OP is in right direction. He puts small refractor on his AVX, not EdgeHD 8" Ketut
  7. For a person who really has never ever ever tried AP before, I think dslr will be easier for them to get started before they can shoot through lrgb filter properly. Imagine a guy who doesn't even know how to ride a bicycle, wants to learn ride a motorbike. I will suggest him learn with Honda Scoopy (automatic) first, because there are basic things he needs to learn: balance, acceleration & break. After he get used to it, then he can tries to ride the superior Kawasaki Ninja with clutch Ketut
  8. Jez, you have to listen to me Why? Because....both of us: - Have a baby sitting mount, AVX - Use +/- 400mm small refractor - Are a portable newbie imager Suggestion:" Used cheap canon dslr + BYEOS" If you are really really a newbie, the are many things you have to learn before you are ready for a mono camera. - Balance the mount (toward the telescope & 'little more heavy' east balancing) - Precise polar alignment - Focusing - Calibration frames - Dithering - Star alignment (ASPA) - Plate solving - Processing your data - Bla bla bla... Practice your polar alignment at the backyard. Try to get a precise PA within 30m Here are the unguided images with AVX+AT65EDQ+60D -> 180sec & 300sec Now, you are ready to learn the auto guiding. - Ascom, focusing, exposure, saturated star, min motion, aggressive, hysteresis, bla bla bla..... Now, you are ready. Sell the dslr, purchase a mono camera, LRGB/NB filter, EFW. Learn the auto focus, sho, hst hargb, lrgb, bla bla bla.... Then, you need more FL for galaxy, need a better mount to handle your bigger telescope, bla bla bla... Regards, Ketut My ASI1600-MM cooled is on the way to Bali...wheeeeeeeeeee
  9. rigradio

    DSO

  10. rigradio

    Markarian.jpg

    From the album: DSO

  11. rigradio

    Markarian.jpg

    From the album: DSO

  12. Hi Tony, Quoted from another thread: "The next tip is that it might help defocus the guide scope slightly. If you are having problems with saturated stars, or you are exceeding the 4x pixel scale rule, this may help. Defocusing will spread the light of the star over more camera pixels which can prevent saturation, and also makes it easier for PHD to detect the centroid of the guide star more accurately. Don't go mad with defocusing or PHD won't be able to lock onto the star and you may start getting ‘Star Lost’ errors if your SN figure drops too much due to de-focusing. In all cases your guide star still needs to have a brighter central peak and not turn into a hollow doughnut, but a bit of defocus on the guide scope may help where you have SN to spare. You can use the ‘Star Profile’ option on the ‘Tools’ menu to check the profile of your guide star once selected. It should have a peak in the middle like a mountain. If it is flat on top you have a saturated star, and if there is a dip you need to focus more." Source -> PHD Guidng Basic & Troubleshooting Ketut
  13. Rough focusing: - focus in day time on a distant object...or - focus on the moon it's much easier ....you want the star slightly defocused anyway Ketut
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.