Jump to content

Beulah

Moderators
  • Posts

    8,228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Beulah

  1. The 200p is a great telescope! Also well within the sweet spot of decent aperture and portability! I wheeled mine a mile up the road to access some light pollution-free skies...

    It's a bit of a strange experience when using scopes of smaller aperture. You initially feel disappointed with the decrease in size but as you become more experienced in observing, it's amazing what you can see. I have observing equipment of various apertures and gave had satisfying observing sessions with all of them, whether it's viewing a planet through a 20", seeing nebulae though 8, 12 or 16" of aperture,  right through to spotting M31 through 10x50 binoculars during a quick session. 

    The only thing I can attribute to this is years of experience perhaps making me more adaptable? I don't know but is this some sort of recovery cycle from aperture fever? 😁

    • Like 3
  2. Indeed, it is a problem when some of us work FT+...but the pain and regret at missing out on gazing into the night sky, or missing rare astronomical events seems to outstrip the need for sleep, coupled with the rarity of clear skies at night in the UK..

    Life, work and stargazing seem to take their turns in priority and somehow it works...but how I long for more free time!

     

    • Like 2
  3. I own both  (300p) 12" Skywatchers: flextube and solid. There are pros and cons to both.

    The flextube definitely requires more frequent collimation although once set up for an observing session, the truss design is stable. The benefits to this design is space saving, although you may get questions asked, such as, "what are you brewing in there?". In addition, you can use binoviewers with the flextube as there are two stop positions, fully extended for eyepiece use, partially extended for binoviewers. The flextube is also slightly heavier. The two stop positions don't exist with the 400p and I don't know about the 250p.

    You will also need a reinforced shroud due to the three truss design letting in stray light (astrozap is the go-to brand for these)

    I like both types of telescope...the solid tube can hold collimation for a few sessions although it is good to check every time.

    Oddly enough, I prefer the flextube design...

     

    • Like 1
  4. Dave Eagle's book is great for astrophotography - highly recommend it. 😊 It's great that the Affinity suite of software, especially Affinity Photo, is getting more recognition and is a cheaper, viable alternative to the Adobe suite (Which I have through work...).

    On a professional level and out of curiosity, I published a few design projects, printed and digital using Affinity Designer and was pleased with the results.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.