Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

wookie1965

Members
  • Posts

    8,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by wookie1965

  1. 4 hours ago, wesdon1 said:

    @wookie1965 Thanks so much for kind words Wookie! 

    Aww that saddens me! Surely with a 10" dob you would atleast make out some of the cores of M51 and M101? Tbh though, I haven't ever seen them visually through an EP, I've only imaged them. Now that you've brought this to my attention, and we don't live far away from each other ( I assume? Merseyside? I'm in Merseyside. Wavertree Liverpool, more specifically ) I am going to take some low power EP's outside during my next imaging session and see if I can make out any details of said Galaxies mate. I'll get back to you and let you know how I get on. Bare in mind aswell, my largest 'scope is 8inch aperture, and I have hideous LED street lamps blazing down onto the gardens, so if I manage to resolve ANYTHING of either Galaxy, then you should definitely be able to too my friend!

    Clear Skies!

    Wes. ( Bortle 7 )

    Cheers Wez,

                 I'm in St Helens just down from the "big head" if you know that. 

    I have horrendous light pollution I am going the Brecon Beacons next weekend hoping get a clear night 

    Best Wishes 

    Paul 

    Streetlight.jpg

    • Sad 1
  2. On 04/03/2023 at 13:32, Mr Spock said:

    I keep everything in Excel. Here's an example of a session from last year:

    Region γ Cyg region
       
    Date from 20:30 27/09/2022 to 01:30 28/09/22
    Scope Stella Lyra 12" Newt
    Eyepieces 42mm LVW, x40, LVW 22mm x69, LVW 17mm x89, LVW 13mm x117, LVW 8mm x190, LVW 5mm x304
    Conditions very good seeing and very good transparency - mag 4.8 in the direction of Cygnus
       
     β 665 A faint and slightly uneven pair near γ Cyg; tight at x190
    MLB 21 Too faint, sec not seen - should have been though at mag 12.0
    D 22 An easy but uneven pair at x190
    TOR 25  Very faint secondary, seems fainter than the published mag
    MLB 22 A faint uneven pair x190
    OΣΣ 206 A very wide pair x117
    SEI 1117 Wide pair in the same field as OΣΣ 206 with a fainter star inbetween
    SEI 1115 Wide pair at x190; in the same field as J 129 which was also resolved
    TDT 2232 A tight, faint pair at x304
    TDT 2233 In the same x304 field as TDT 2232; not as tight but a fainter secondary
    Σ 2668 A bright uneven pair in the middle of a group of other doubles - the next five below
    SEI 1091 Very wide, uneven pair at x69
    SEI 1090 Very wide, uneven pair at x69
    SEI 1094 Wide and very easy at x190
    SEI 1097 Another wide pair at x190
    TDS 1061 Tightest of the group, but resolved at x190
     β 661 A very bright orange primary with a very faint secondary, x190
    h 2951 A wide uneven pair at x190
    Cou 2537 Tight! 0.8" resolved at x304 in moments of steady seeing
    Σ 2663 A lovely even pair; looked nice at x117
    HDS 90 Faint secondary - mag 12.6, about half the separation of Σ 2663 and in the same field at x117
    SEI 1051 Wide uneven pair at x69
    SEI 1070 Wide uneven pair at x69
    COU 2536 Strangely difficult. Split at x190 in moments of steady seeing
    SEI 1078 Another one of these wide, uneven blue pairs that seen to litter this region. X69

    Wow can I ask where you get your information from I have never seen 3/4 of those doubles.

    • Like 1
  3. I dont know about astrophotography but if you have aligned the polar scope up with the mount like you said on a TV aerial to check put the end of the aerial on the ring in the polar scope either you or someone else rotate the weight bar and make sure the end of the aerial stays on the circle all the way around.

    if you use android download Synscaniit from here https://synscaninit-2.soft112.com/    that will show you everything to put in the handset and Polaris position once you have done that do your 2 or 3 star alignment and it should be accurate.

    Paul

    • Like 1
  4. 51 minutes ago, wesdon1 said:

    @wookie1965 Hi wookie, did you mean you haven't been able to view M51 from your home/location? and was the "wow" a reaction to my pic? If yes then thank you so much for such kind remarks my friend! It would have been a lot better if the wind hadn't ruined about 70% of my subs! lol. @happy-kat very kindly made some really helpful suggestions to tackle said issues with my subs so I'm going to try them all out at the first opportunity!

    Clear Skies! 

    Wes ( Bortle 7 )

    Yes Wow for the picture and yes I have never seen M51 from home or the Leo trio I have even purchased a 10" dob, had a couple of clear nights here but the wind was horrendous blowing a hooley no point setting up as the scope would of been all over the place.

    Paul

    • Sad 1
  5. Yes incorporating skysafari into it or a way of using skysafari with starsense. 

    1 hour ago, Sunshine said:

    By that you mean? incorporating skysafari to be used with starsense? 

    Yes incorporating skysafari into it or a way of using skysafari with starsense

    25 minutes ago, DaveL59 said:

    Worth mentioning too if its the starsense explorer which uses your phone vs the other more self-contained version.

    Yes the starsense explorer app on the phone to be used with my 10" dob 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.