Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

Walky

Members
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Walky

  1. I dont want to spend much. I want a setup to take photos of the Horse nebula and maybe one or two other interesting things. No ore. Then off to other type of photography.
  2. Apparently not available in USA. Could I mount it on a MAnfrotto tripod? What do I need to mount it on a tripod? http://www.365astronomy.com/ts-apo65q-65mm-f65-quadruplet-astrograph-44mm-field-diameter-p-2553.html
  3. Thank you for the follow up, I was really worried about the identity of my "Venus" Now to wait for better wide views of the night sky.
  4. I failed to say I was shooting through a window and probably that spec of light was indeed a reflection. No spec appeared tonight when I shot outside. No mosquitoes! Hurrah! Here they are: http://stargazerslounge.com/gallery/album/2814-venus-october-30-2013/
  5. Walky

    Venus, October 30, 2013

    i took these images with my new 70-200 L (f4) and the Sigma 17-70 (f 2.8) now that I have better skies. The 17-70 was bought a few weeks ago to see if I can get a single good photo of the MWay although I know with all the LP we have it is going to be difficult. In the meantime, until I get to that goal, here is Venus. Most of the photos are cropped although not at the same degree. Setting in manual, changing almost always the exposure, ISO almost always 200. Exposures from 0.5 sec to 15 sec.
  6. They were taken at evening, roughly around 7PM ET in Orlando, Florida. I am not that much into AP as to wake up early in the morning for photos.
  7. Apparently, the bigger file (one in the middle) gets re-sized when uploaded so it looses its resolution. Let's try this again.
  8. Here is the thing. The lens is f/2.8, though it is 18-70, so it provides quite a good resolution. I think 70mm is quite good for that unless you want only one spot on a dark sky, which I was trying to avoid by using only 70mm. IMO, they look better with a few stars around. Anyway.... I am uploading the biggest size that I have from yesternight (?) so you can enlarge them 100% if you wish. I can use a max of 280 tonight using a Canon L f/4 lens. I don't like this one for astrophotography because of the F/4, but will do. Also have a 75-300 that can go 420 with extender (can do well, too). I will experiment, though I am sure NOW that is Jupiter, not Venus. #1: Point and Shoot version; lack of resolution shows it as a single dot #2: A prior shot taken 10_15_2013 of what I thought was Venus #3: Actual shot real size taken 10_29_2013 last night with f/2.8 70mm (18-70 Sigma( lens & Canon T2i.(the one in discussion) They may not be in this order,,,
  9. The moon is my identifier or avatar. I posted a file that is on PNG format, I think it is not compatible with the site. CAnnot find how to edit the entry! The thing is, the planet has another dot close to it, so it cannot be Venus, I think.
  10. Walky

    First Attempts at Everything

    Wide Field Tests
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.