Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Gina

Beyond the Event Horizon
  • Posts

    45,326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    120

Blog Comments posted by Gina

  1. Thought I'd  do a Google search for aluminium boxes with the thought that a Peltier TEC in the bottom could warm the dome and found another possibility :-
    ALUMINIUM SQUARE BOX SECTION 11 Sizes 10 Lengths  with one option as 4" square and 100mm high.  That's 4" outside and 3mm thickness.  This makes the inside 95.6mm square.  Now the passive cooler is 95.0mm square so the top of it would fit nicely inside the box section.  It would need clamping on and sealing to keep damp out but it's an interesting idea, I think.

  2. It's just occurred to me that I was going to use some of the heat from the hot side of the Peltier TEC to warm the underside of the dome to help with dew heating and stop dew on the outside, but now I don't see how I can.  It just seems daft to have heat to get rid of and heat wanted under the dome yet "ne'er the twain shall meet".  I may get thinking again and see if there is any way of using the spare heat.

  3. I think combining the two is on.  There would be a 5mm gap between the housing and the cooler which could be filled with rubber foam for sealing.  The disadvantage would be that this seal would by the only thing separating the camera from the atmosphere unless I use sealant around the Peltier TEC and its leads.

  4. This needs work before I can do any more testing.  The focus I set up manually needs setting up again and it's very critical - a few degrees rotation makes a difference, so I need the motor focuser working.  I also need to arrange to clamp the camera onto the Peltier TEC.  Then there's the outer casing and dome to sort out, with the problem of sealing.  I've been concentrating on my observatory today.

  5. This ASI 120MC-S camera seems to be more sensitive than the ASI 185MC though I guess it's difficult to tell with the moon in the image.  There another difference too - when the 185 was imaging the sensor temperature increased whereas with this one it doesn't.  The 185 had a separate image sensor PCB whereas this has the sensor mounted directly on the main PCB.

    I guess I should stop imaging and get on with the construction...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.