Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

rory

Members
  • Content Count

    3,608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rory

  1. Globs , love globs . Particularly m2 and m13 . I was impressed with them when I had a small refractor, then I peered through the 8” dob !
  2. The improvement from 130 to 200 is significant, so in answer to you question. No I doubt you’d be disappointed. saving made from purchasing 8” over 10 “ , could be used to bang on a telrad or a fancy eyepiece . Although others will tell you ... Aperture is king ?
  3. Having previously owned 8” and 10” skywatcher dobsonians , I personally felt the 8” was better value . More forgiving on eyepieces , slightly easier to shift about and obviously cheaper . But importantly, to my eyes ( admittedly novice ones ) the difference visually is very slight indeed , often I couldn’t tell any difference. Im hoping to jump back in to visual astronomy soon and will be looking at an 8” dob .which particular make is another dilemma , although the bressers look the mutts . If I were to go for something of real improvement visually from that ,I’d skip
  4. Thanks for your reply . Does the base move smoothly without needing to start DIY ing ?
  5. Anyone own or used one of these ? views / thoughts ? Ta .
  6. Looking for any recommendations for a stargazing / moon book suitable for youngsters.(7&8) It will be a gift to go along with a small telescope ( probably a sw heritage 76) Turn left is an option , but any other recommendations greatly appreciated. Clear skies
  7. Like Patbloke , i got by with a cheap drum stool , works well for about £20 . Agree also regarding a raci Finder or telrad/ rigel finder . Straight through finders on dobs are terrible to use .
  8. hope it brings you years of enjoyment. as stated above ,theres little in the way of images of this scope. whats the collimation adjusters like ? knobs or screws /alen keys .
  9. A great post , thanks for sharing .
  10. have to say that looks very nice for a mass produced scope. very nice indeed. any idea who makes the mirrors for this ?
  11. rory

    Meesier 13

    Fantastic work .
  12. Setting up a dob takes seconds. Collimation is something that takes a minute or two once you've grasped it . Often it won't need doing at all. So there's nothing to worry about on that score . The guy was going wrong badly if after three nights , found he was spending more time setting up than observing .
  13. Astromaster Finder scopes are as you say , absolutely useless . Why on earth they continue to put those bits of plastic on what is otherwise a perfectly usable telescope I don't know. I had s 90mm astro master and discarded the Finder almost immediately . I purchased a half decent low power eyepiece , this worked well for wide field views and and a Finder . ( 32mm plossl). Later I bagged myself a telrad . it's a great bit of kit , one of the best purchases I ever made .
  14. " illustrated guide to astronomical wonders" It's like a follow on from turn left . The title is a mouthfull I know , but it's a great book .
  15. Great sketch . Very impressive .
  16. price wise I don't know how they compare to ES or the meades .
  17. Indeed they are . Worked nicely with the mv's
  18. I agree with Russ . I actually had the set up he suggests with my old 200p. I bought the 16 and 24mm mv's, and got a bresser SA barlow ( the same as telextender) Which gave a nice spread of options X50,75,100,150.
  19. Sagittarius amazed me from a farmers field with a semi rural Sky . It's just such a shame it stays quite low to the horizon.
  20. Interesting debate. I tend to always do some research on an item , particularly if it's what I'd consider a big purchase . In this day and age it takes a few minutes to check prices of goods new or used . I think if it's a used item and a private sale , then buyer beware . It's up to you to decide if it's worth the asking price . Not for the seller to justify it .
  21. Glad you mentioned that John . I used the aspheric in a f/6 8" . But now I have a 4.7 I'll know to avoid. Guideline does make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.