Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

dweller25

Members
  • Posts

    6,202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by dweller25

  1. Assuming you have a suitable mountโ€ฆ. Both have probably similar optical quality, but the 120 has more resolution and light gathering so that would be my choice. PS - there is an SW Equinox ED120 in the for sale section.
  2. Great pictures @Jessilee, welcome to SGL ๐Ÿ™‚
  3. dweller25

    Newbie

    You might want to start your own thread and introduce yourself ๐Ÿ‘
  4. Do you need more in focus or out focus with smaller eyepieces ? If in focus is needed you may be able to remove an extension ring off the focuser. If out focus is needed you can add an extension ring or just pull the eyepiece out a little bit and then secure it.
  5. dweller25

    Newbie

    Welcome to SGL ๐Ÿ‘
  6. Hello @Florida Bear and welcome to SGL. A 13mm eyepiece gives x50 - thats the focal length of the telescope divided by the focal length of the eyepiece, so 650/13 = 50. At the moment Saturn is well past closest approach so is very small. You can certainly use shorter focal length eyepieces in your scope, for the planets I would suggest x185 (a 3.5mm eyepiece) is good. Or you could buy a x2 barlow lens that doubles the focal length of your telescope to 1300mm and then use a 7mm eyepiece to get x185. Comets are dull smudges even in bigger scopes. โ€stellariumโ€ is a great piece of free astronomy software that you can download to see what is in the night sky. Hope that helps.
  7. I suspect you may need a good 18โ€ scope and good seeing to view Amalthea.
  8. I also think more and more that as the UK does not have consistently great skies that quality over quantity for visual astronomy may be the way to go.
  9. I had an 1/10th wave OO VX8L mounted on an EQ mount, it did not blow me away visually compared to the 8โ€ Skywatcher Newt that I had. It was lighter and a little better optically but MUCH more expensive. But both scopes got to some awkward viewing positions and the tripod legs got in the way a lot. I found my back started complaining after a while so sold them. Now all my scopes have the eyepiece at the back and I sit to view - much more relaxing and my back thanks me for it. But Newts do give the best performance to cost ratio.
  10. Perfect, enjoy your scope ๐Ÿ‘
  11. Is the crown at the front of the scope, facing incoming light ?
  12. @wookie1965 Just for clarity here is a diagram of how the lens arrangement should be, with the crown facing the starsโ€ฆ..
  13. Correct, โ€œyou cannot make a silk purse out of a sows earโ€ ๐Ÿคฃ
  14. I had a good C6, an excellent C8 and a terrible C9.25. In my opinion SCT optical quality varies. For the same price as a C9.25 you can buy a Takahashi 180mm Mewlon with 1/20th wave optics which seem to get consistent praise ๐Ÿ™‚
  15. Sounds like you may have bought a fancy brass scope toDAY ? ๐Ÿ™‚
  16. I have everything crossed ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿคž
  17. I would suggest as your configuration is not working that you just flip the thin top lens over so that both arrows point in the same direction and give that a try to see if you get improvement.
  18. Did it work OK when you first received it ?
  19. Hello @wookie1965 I received an eyepiece that displayed the same views you described with your scope. The lenses had been put back into the eyepiece the wrong way round. I suspect all you need to do is turn the lenses to the same orientation as the above diagram and you will have a good scope ๐Ÿ‘
  20. You may have the lenses the wrong way round ? They should be like thisโ€ฆ.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.