Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

DIY 16" binoscope


keith5700

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, AstroKeith said:

Nice engineering!

The price you get is proportional to the size of the market. This is a pretty unique instrument and you may be searching for a customer, rather than the other way around. Anyone interested in forking out say £6k is going to be pretty demanding too. (If it was me I'd worry about dew)

So I definitely consider selling just the mirror sets.

Yes, I fear you may be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have built both SCT and Maksutov binoscopes, initially attracted by the compactness.  However, the relatively high resultant magnification and restricted field of view, for me, detracted from the main benefit of binoviewers, the wide field potential.  In this regard I feel that refractors and Newtonians are a better option.

Another drawback of the catadioptric binoviewer is that considerable back focus is necessary to account for the additional optics to achieve translation to normal eye separation, although possible easily due to the moving mirror focusing, any mirror shift causes misalignment of the images.  Adding a third party external focuser to overcome this just exacerbates the back focus problem.    🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Peter Drew said:

I have built both SCT and Maksutov binoscopes, initially attracted by the compactness.  However, the relatively high resultant magnification and restricted field of view, for me, detracted from the main benefit of binoviewers, the wide field potential.  In this regard I feel that refractors and Newtonians are a better option.

Another drawback of the catadioptric binoviewer is that considerable back focus is necessary to account for the additional optics to achieve translation to normal eye separation, although possible easily due to the moving mirror focusing, any mirror shift causes misalignment of the images.  Adding a third party external focuser to overcome this just exacerbates the back focus problem.    🙂

Yes, all valid points. There’s no getting around the field of view reduction, so I’ll have to think if I can live with it.

I’ve not done much work on a design yet, but I was thinking of spacing the tubes apart and bringing the light cone out the side of the tube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, keith5700 said:

Yes, all valid points. There’s no getting around the field of view reduction, so I’ll have to think if I can live with it.

I’ve not done much work on a design yet, but I was thinking of spacing the tubes apart and bringing the light cone out the side of the tube.

That would be an interesting option, I presume you propose tertiary flats?  Catadioptric telescopes usually have large central obstructions so plenty of room to hide them.   🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/07/2023 at 20:09, Peter Drew said:

That would be an interesting option, I presume you propose tertiary flats?  Catadioptric telescopes usually have large central obstructions so plenty of room to hide them.   🙂

Yes, tertiary flats, similar set up as on my current scope. Hoping it will be a bit easier as I won’t be standing in the light path.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.