Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

hydrogen beta filter


Recommended Posts

hi all i got a set of narrowband imaging filters second hand the other week and there is a Hb filter what can i use it on nebula wise and also what colour should it be converted to

thanks

mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strangely enough I was out last night imaging the rosette for the first time with a Hbeta filter. I'll look forward to processing this data to see what kind of impact it may have on the finished image. I'll just add it seemed good at rejecting moonlight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi all i got a set of narrowband imaging filters second hand the other week and there is a Hb filter what can i use it on nebula wise and also what colour should it be converted to

thanks

mark

The NB filter will isolate the data corresponding to its pass band, what colour you wish it to be mapped to is up to you that is why you read " mapped to the Hubble palette, RGB or any other combination of the R,G an d B " . These colours are only the visual representation of the data and  some combinations are more aesthetically pleasing than others.

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a mono camera there is no upside (except possibly if you you don't have a H-alpha filter) with a H-beta since the H-alpha is stronger. Visually the H-beta beats the alpha since our eyes are much more sensitive to that wavelength. I have been thinking that a H-beta (or possibly H-gamma) filter could be useful for unmodded DSLRs since they are well clear of the IR filter and the Bayer matrix has 50% blue pixels but I have not had the time to run the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a H-alpha filter I'd think twice about also using the H-beta. The images will be nearly identical although the hydrogen emissions of the H-beta will be weaker and the stars might be either weaker or stronger depending on colour of the star and the narrowness of the filters). You'd save a lot of time just assigning H-alpha to two colours. Another problem is that most H-beta filters are design for visual use in mind, not imaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a H-alpha filter I'd think twice about also using the H-beta. The images will be nearly identical although the hydrogen emissions of the H-beta will be weaker and the stars might be either weaker or stronger depending on colour of the star and the narrowness of the filters). You'd save a lot of time just assigning H-alpha to two colours. Another problem is that most H-beta filters are design for visual use in mind, not imaging.

This is not correct I am afraid. The emission line  for Hb is ~452nm which places it firmly in the Blue region, Ha has a ~ 652nm emission line which is in  the Red end of the spectrum. The two images will be quite different. You maybe confusing this with Oiii that has an emission line of ~496 nm and is actually a Teal colour. There is a debate about having more benefit in using Hb on some targets rather than Oiii which is in fact quite weak with the same targets.

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it looks like i need to experiment a bit ,if ha is dominant and o3 is weak use hb instead?? ,is there a list of dso that have strong hb, i know the rosette is , i probably wouldnt have bothered to put hb filter in the wheel to be honest but it was in with the other filters maybe take it out and not worry about it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • This is from the Astronomic web site. 

 Hydrgon-Beta filters help backyard astronomers to see faint and elusive nebulas such as the Horsehead, California, and Cocoon Nebulas.

 

I did some looking and it seems there may not be enough objects to make a list of?

  •  

Visual observation (dark skies): Very good, but only suitable for a few objects

Visual observation (urban skies): Unsuitable

Film photography: It depends, very long exposure time

CCD photography: Very good, but only suitable for a few objects

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not correct I am afraid. The emission line  for Hb is ~452nm which places it firmly in the Blue region, Ha has a ~ 652nm emission line which is in  the Red end of the spectrum. The two images will be quite different. You maybe confusing this with Oiii that has an emission line of ~496 nm and is actually a Teal colour. There is a debate about having more benefit in using Hb on some targets rather than Oiii which is in fact quite weak with the same targets.

 

A.G

I'm well aware that Ha and Hb have different colours. My point is that they are emitted from the same spectral series (the Balmer series). This means that Hb is going to be more or less identical to Ha except Hb will bearound 3 times fainter. For photographic use with a mono camera you'd be wasting a lot of time if you'd use Hb instead of or in addition to Ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it looks like i need to experiment a bit ,if ha is dominant and o3 is weak use hb instead?? ,is there a list of dso that have strong hb, i know the rosette is , i probably wouldnt have bothered to put hb filter in the wheel to be honest but it was in with the other filters maybe take it out and not worry about it :)

Emission nebulae are rich in Ha, reflection nebulae are rich in Oiii as they are usually energised by a hot blue star nearby.

a.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.