Bit of a laugh - The moon does not exist!!

[urema]

Found this today when searching google for an error in Java...i found it even more funny that it came up under an 'error' search in Google.

The Mad Revisionist

The moon does not exist - clearly lol!

Enjoy

U.

[roboticsound]

Best part for me:

"But don’t all qualified scientists and astronomers agree that there is a moon? Indeed, but shouldn’t one be suspicious of such unanimity"

ROTFLMAO

[urema]

Lol yes, just brilliant.

This is painfully funny too, GSCE science would knock this answer out in a second...

"Do an experiment: take a rubber ball and suspend it above a bathtub full of water. Now slowly move the ball closer to the water. Does the level of the water change? Not even slightly. So much for the tides myth. "

Cracking ignorance...

U.

[Superewza]

Brilliant, but it isn't actually serious

Over the past several decades, a movement known as "Holocaust revisionism" (known to its opponents as "Holocaust denial") has developed and grown amid much controversy. This theory suggests that the Holocaust - that is, the murder of approximately six million Jews as an intentional policy of genocide on the part of the **** regime - is, in fact, an elaborate hoax. Further, that the evidence historians use to study this event was fabricated by a powerful Jewish conspiracy for political and financial gain.

Proponents of this theory have been labeled as ignorant bigots, and accused of exploiting one of the greatest tragedies of our century in order to spread age-old anti-Semitic conspiracy myths and to whitewash the genocidal crimes of the **** regime. We at THE MAD REVISIONIST, feel that these courageous men and women have been unfairly characterized. They are, in fact, geniuses - visionaries who, despite their apparent lack of qualification, have managed to develop a whole new methodology for determining historical truth.

Their only shortcoming is their failure to apply this methodology more extensively. Not only the Holocaust, but the whole of World War II must be re-examined with these new tools of inquiry. In fact, now that revisionism has come of age, why shouldn’t every historical event be subjected to its scrutiny? And why restrict this methodology to the discipline of history when there are so many other areas of knowledge that cling to dogmas derived from the worn-out, ivory-tower standards of academic responsibility. We believe it is a sin to confine revisionism to one solitary issue in one discipline when it could be used to uncover valuable new truths in so many other fields of human endeavor.

THE MAD REVISIONIST seeks to correct this oversight.

We therefore present to you with our series of essays dedicated to the manufacturing of truth through the discarding of evidence:

I may have seen one of them on a tv programme once...

[scotty_le_b]

Lol yes, just brilliant.

This is painfully funny too, GSCE science would knock this answer out in a second...

"Do an experiment: take a rubber ball and suspend it above a bathtub full of water. Now slowly move the ball closer to the water. Does the level of the water change? Not even slightly. So much for the tides myth. "

Haha that was my thaughts exactly. I really wanted to speak to the person who wrote that. It really annoyed me:mad::L