milkyjoe Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 I noticed a strange thing last night while observing the moon, apart from the fact that it was freezing-gave for some good viewing though!If I took off the middle section of the lens cap on my achromat refractor I didn't seem to get ANY CA whatsoever, but as soon as I took off the rest of it, CA appears!! Sorry if I'm a bit behind on this one, but observing the moon without CA was much better (still would like a WO Meg though ;-))Richard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Indeed. What you have done is, in effect, increase the focal ratio of your telescope, making it 'slower'. You are only using the centre part of the lens so you've reduced its aperture but the focal length remains the same. In refracters CA rises as the focal ratio diminishes which is why fast apos are so expensive and why very slow achromats give superb freedom from CA. The more the lens has to 'bend' the incident light the more the different wavelengths separate and the harder it is for the optician to gather them all together again at the focal plane! Also a 'fast' system has the light coming in from a wide angle so moving the EP or chip only a tiny amount moves it way out of focus. In a slow system the light converges from a narrower angle so is more tolerant of being slightly out of focus. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milkyjoe Posted October 25, 2010 Author Share Posted October 25, 2010 Thanks Olly. That's interesting. Should I buy an APO now?? lol :-\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 You have now had a taste of relatively CA-free viewing - is there any going back now ?!!Your resolution will have dropped with the reduction in aperture as well though so there is no "free lunch" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Drew Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Beautifully described Olly, that answer should be a "sticky"! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perrin6 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Richard,Did you know that reflectors don't suffer from chromatic aberration (unless the eyepiece introduces it), that's why Isaac Newton invented them, (So who needs expensive APO's eh? eh? )Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milkyjoe Posted October 25, 2010 Author Share Posted October 25, 2010 Yes, I did know that, but I like refractors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianb Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Olly has it about right ... just to add that cheap eyepieces (and some not so cheap ones) also contribute chromatic aberration when used with a scope design which is too "fast" for them ...... but don't forget, when stopping down an objective, that resolution is dependent on aperture, and light grasp is proportional to the square of the aperture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.