Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

How tight should the retaining collar be on a SW conical mirror?


Recommended Posts

When we dismantled my SW 16” Dob primary mirror assembly, the threaded retaining collar was quite loose, you could waggle the mirror from side to side. I’m guessing the collar should be tight enough to eliminate any play but no more, as this would put the glass under tension, definitely not a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't own a SW dob - I own an Orion Optics one which I have dismantled a few times - I'm struggling to understand what the retaining collar is on your OTA.

This could just be differences in build of the telescopes but it would help if you could you send a picture or link.

If it is a part of the mirror cell, there is a small amount of play in the retaining pieces that hold the mirror in place - they hold the mirror loosely in place, and a bit of side to side movement was possible. I understand this is necessary for thermal expansion of the glass, which would fit your conjecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The larger Sky Watcher Dob mirrors have a ribbed, conical back, with a central coarse threaded boss. This is used to secure the mirror to an alloy support frame, this is what the collimation screws work against. Presumably SW came up with this design to save weight and manufacturing costs. I’ll see if I can post some photos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a photo of the cell arrangement and back of the mirror. The conical shape and ribbed structure are visible. The central threaded collar is also visible, the cover plate with the two small screws is, I think, a safety feature to prevent the collar unscrewing and falling off. If it did, there would be nothing preventing the mirror from dropping into the tube if the scope was placed below the horizontal.

IMG_1486.jpeg.fc004e7c13e0099f6ffd7f5d564e1b49.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

From what I have read it should only be tightened until sufficient force is subjected onto the individual collimation springs. It shouldn't be loose. I'll try and find the article in which I read it 

Edited by bosun21
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.