M33

[Rodd]

Palette has been my downfall in this data.  I think I finally renedered a fairly ballanmced image-not to saturated, though I think some of the Ha is still to colorful.  And in reality-the whole image is too colorful; certainly not what it l;ooks like in an eyepiece.  Buts its the best I can manage.....so far.  There is a color imballance that I have tried to minimize.  Not sure why.  This is the TOA 130 with a .7x reducer.  The resolution doesn't seem that much inferior to the .99x flattener, and the FOV is much greater.

[Rodd]

Again, a botch. Always the palette. Here is a better version.

 

[mackiedlm]

I dont see anything botched with these - I think both are excellent. I like the colour and saturation levels

[Rodd]

17 minutes ago, mackiedlm said:

I dont see anything botched with these - I think both are excellent. I like the colour and saturation levels

Thanks Mack. Perhaps botched is to harsh a term. 

[geeklee]

Both excellent @Rodd Really enjoyable Ha detail.  I prefer the first version.  

[Bluemoonjim]

First class

[Rodd]

1 hour ago, geeklee said:

Both excellent @Rodd Really enjoyable Ha detail.  I prefer the first version.  

Too red.  That was my main complaint. Too pink in non-Ha areas.  Matter of opinion, I guess

[Rodd]

1 hour ago, Bluemoonjim said:

First class

Thanks!